• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸痛测压评估中的食管内气囊扩张术

Intraesophageal balloon distention in the manometric evaluation of chest pain.

作者信息

Maher K A, Deschner W K, Cattau E L, Benjamin S B

出版信息

Gastroenterol Nurs. 1990 Summer;13(1):4-8.

PMID:2288948
Abstract

Drug provocation is routinely used during esophageal manometry in the evaluation of chest pain of presumed esophageal origin. As significant side effects have been associated with the use of drugs in provocation, and these provocative tests are inadequately sensitive to exclude esophageal etiology as the cause of chest pain, alternative provocative tests have been sought. Intraesophageal balloon distention (IEBD) has recently been reintroduced as a method of pain provocation in the manometric evaluation of chest pain. IEBD produces pain on distention which resolves immediately on deflation. To evaluate graded IEBD as an effective and safe method of pain provocation, 66 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain and 10 asymptomatic volunteers were studied. We conclude that balloon distention is an effective and safe method of pain provocation and can easily be performed in conjunction with standard esophageal manometry.

摘要

在评估疑似食管源性胸痛时,药物激发试验在食管测压过程中经常被使用。由于在激发试验中使用药物会产生显著的副作用,并且这些激发试验对排除食管病因作为胸痛原因的敏感性不足,因此一直在寻找替代的激发试验。食管内气囊扩张术(IEBD)最近作为一种在胸痛测压评估中引发疼痛的方法被重新引入。IEBD在扩张时产生疼痛,放气后疼痛立即缓解。为了评估分级IEBD作为一种有效且安全的疼痛激发方法,对66例连续出现胸痛的患者和10名无症状志愿者进行了研究。我们得出结论,气囊扩张是一种有效且安全的疼痛激发方法,并且可以很容易地与标准食管测压联合进行。

相似文献

1
Intraesophageal balloon distention in the manometric evaluation of chest pain.胸痛测压评估中的食管内气囊扩张术
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1990 Summer;13(1):4-8.
2
Intraesophageal balloon distention versus drug provocation in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Aug;85(8):938-43.
3
[Pseudo-angina pain of esophageal origin. Results of functional study and value of the balloon distention test].[食管源性假性心绞痛。功能研究结果及球囊扩张试验的价值]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1990;14(4):334-41.
4
Intraesophageal balloon distention in the evaluation of sensory thresholds: studies on reproducibility and comparison of balloon composition.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Aug;89(8):1185-90.
5
[Esophageal thoracic pain: what can be done?].[食管胸痛:该如何应对?]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1994 Mar 12;124(10):402-8.
6
Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction.对疑似食管动力障碍患者进行药物激发的前瞻性测压评估。
Gastroenterology. 1983 May;84(5 Pt 1):893-901.
7
[Thoracic pain of esophageal origin. Assessment of 125 consecutive patients with resting angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries].[食管源性胸痛。125例静息性心绞痛且冠状动脉造影正常患者的评估]
Med Clin (Barc). 1996 Jan 27;106(3):81-6.
8
Comparison of hypertonic glucose to other provocative tests in patients with noncardiac chest pain.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1987 May;82(5):406-9.
9
[pHmetry and manometry of the esophagus in patients with pain of the angina type and a normal angiography].[血管造影正常的心绞痛型疼痛患者食管的pH测量与测压]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1988 Feb;12(2):111-7.
10
[Esophageal motility in cases of chest pain with normal coronarography].[冠状动脉造影正常的胸痛病例中的食管动力]
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1987;138(6):407-10.