• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普卢利沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗呼吸道及尿路感染的多中心、双盲、随机对照临床研究。

Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Southwest Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 2012;58(3):249-56. doi: 10.1159/000339718. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1159/000339718
PMID:22890091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prulifloxacin is a promising fluoroquinolone antibiotic. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical study was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to that of levofloxacin for the treatment of respiratory and urinary infections of Chinese patients.

METHODS

A total of 267 patients were enrolled and each was randomly assigned to either the treatment or the control group. Prulifloxacin 264.2 mg (equivalent to ulifloxacin 200 mg) b.i.d. or levofloxacin hydrochloride 200 mg b.i.d. was administered orally for 5-14 days according to a patient's condition. The clinical response, bacterial eradication and incidence of adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three patients completed the study. For the modified intention-to-treat population, the cure and effective rates were 45.53 and 82.93% in the prulifloxacin group and 49.18 and 83.61% in the levofloxacin group. For the per-protocol analysis population, the cure and effective rates were 45.90 and 83.61% in the prulifloxacin group and 49.59 and 83.47% in the levofloxacin group. The bacterial eradication rates were 96.59 and 95.35%, and the drug-related adverse event rates were 7.87 and 5.51% in the prulifloxacin and levofloxacin group, respectively. The cure rate and efficacy rate of respiratory and urinary tract infections of the levofloxacin group were better than those of the prulifloxacin group. However, the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prulifloxacin is as effective and well tolerated as levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.

摘要

背景

普卢利沙星是一种很有前途的氟喹诺酮类抗生素。本研究采用多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验,旨在评价其疗效和安全性,并与左氧氟沙星治疗中国患者呼吸道和泌尿道感染进行比较。

方法

共纳入 267 例患者,按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组各 133 例。根据患者病情,分别予普卢利沙星 264.2 mg(相当于左氧氟沙星 200 mg),每日 2 次;或盐酸左氧氟沙星 200 mg,每日 2 次,口服治疗 5~14 天。评价临床疗效、细菌清除率及不良反应发生率。

结果

243 例患者完成研究。意向性治疗分析集(mITT)人群中,普卢利沙星组和左氧氟沙星组的痊愈率和有效率分别为 45.53%和 82.93%、49.18%和 83.61%;符合方案集(PP)人群中,分别为 45.90%和 83.61%、49.59%和 83.47%。细菌清除率分别为 96.59%和 95.35%,不良反应发生率分别为 7.87%和 5.51%。左氧氟沙星组呼吸道和泌尿道感染的痊愈率和有效率优于普卢利沙星组,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。

结论

普卢利沙星治疗呼吸道和泌尿道感染的疗效与左氧氟沙星相当,安全性良好。

相似文献

1
Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.普卢利沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗呼吸道及尿路感染的多中心、双盲、随机对照临床研究。
Chemotherapy. 2012;58(3):249-56. doi: 10.1159/000339718. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
2
Prulifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections.普卢利沙星与环丙沙星治疗成人复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Urol Int. 2005;74(4):326-31. doi: 10.1159/000084432.
3
Therapeutic effect of the quinolone prodrug prulifloxacin against experimental urinary tract infections in mice.喹诺酮前药普卢利沙星对小鼠实验性尿路感染的治疗作用。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1996 Dec;46(12):1169-73.
4
Prulifloxacin: a new antibacterial fluoroquinolone.普卢利沙星:一种新型抗菌氟喹诺酮类药物。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006 Feb;4(1):27-41. doi: 10.1586/14787210.4.1.27.
5
Prulifloxacin: a review focusing on its use beyond respiratory and urinary tract infections.普卢利沙星:超越呼吸道和尿路感染的应用综述。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Apr;37(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.032.
6
Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.普卢利沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
J Chemother. 2007 Jun;19(3):304-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.3.304.
7
Prulifloxacin versus levofloxacin in the treatment of severe COPD patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.普卢利沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并慢性支气管炎的疗效比较。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;26(5):609-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
[In vitro activity of prulifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against urinary pathogens].[普卢利沙星、左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星对尿路病原体的体外活性]
Infez Med. 2006 Mar;14(1):24-8.
9
Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of levofloxacin and ofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.左氧氟沙星与氧氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的随机、双盲、对照研究
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 1999 Mar;32(1):33-9.
10
Identification and pretherapy susceptibility of pathogens in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis enrolled in a clinical study in the United States from November 2004 through April 2006.2004年11月至2006年4月在美国一项临床研究中登记的复杂性尿路感染或急性肾盂肾炎患者的病原体鉴定及治疗前易感性
Clin Ther. 2007 Oct;29(10):2215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.008.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Overview of the Antibiotics Approved in the Last Two Decades: Retrospects and Prospects.近二十年获批上市的抗生素概述:回顾与展望。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 13;28(4):1762. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041762.
2
A systematic review of the outcomes reported in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection clinical trials.对单纯性尿路感染临床试验中所报告结果的系统评价。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar 22;4(2):dlac025. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac025. eCollection 2022 Apr.