• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊癌 T3/4 及区域淋巴结定义:UICC 与日本分期系统,哪个更合理?

Definition of T3/4 and regional lymph nodes in gallbladder cancer: which is more valid, the UICC or the Japanese staging system?

机构信息

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(11):3567-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2599-5. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2599-5
PMID:22890597
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery (JSBS) staging systems differ in their staging of gallbladder cancer: they define hepatic invasion with or without invasion of another organ as T3 and either T3 or T4, respectively, and posterosuperior pancreatic lymph node (PSPLN) metastases as M1 and N2, respectively.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the survival of 224 patients who had undergone macroscopically curative resection for gallbladder cancer and assessed the influence of the differences between the two staging systems on survival.

RESULTS

JSBS staging stratified the survival curves better for stages III or IV. Fifty-seven patients were classified as UICC-T3 but JSBS-T4. These patients had better survival than did 43 patients with UICC-T4/JSBS-T4 and comparable survival to 17 patients with UICC-T3/JSBS-T3. UICC stage IIIB is composed of two subgroups: U-T2N1 (18 patients) and U-T3N1 (21 patients). Their 5-year survivals were 85 and 41%, respectively (P = 0.01). The latter was comparable to that of 28 T3N0 patients (35%, P = 0.93). The survival of the UICC-M1 patients with disease restricted to PSPLNs was significantly better than that of those with involvement beyond PSPLNs (5-year survival 35 vs. 17%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although UICC staging more accurately defines the T category, JSBS staging better stratifies the prognosis of patients with gallbladder cancer, mainly because UICC stage IIIB includes T1/2N1M0, which is associated with significantly better survival than T3N0M0. It would be appropriate to classify PSPLNs as regional lymph nodes.

摘要

背景

国际抗癌联盟 (UICC) 和日本胆道外科学会 (JSBS) 的胆囊癌分期系统存在差异:它们将肝侵犯伴或不伴其他器官侵犯定义为 T3 和 T3 或 T4,分别为 T3 和 T4,后上胰周淋巴结 (PSPLN) 转移定义为 M1 和 N2,分别为 N2。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 224 例接受根治性手术治疗的胆囊癌患者的生存情况,并评估了两种分期系统之间的差异对生存的影响。

结果

JSBS 分期对 III 期或 IV 期的生存曲线分层更好。57 例患者被归类为 UICC-T3 但 JSBS-T4。这些患者的生存状况优于 43 例 UICC-T4/JSBS-T4 患者,与 17 例 UICC-T3/JSBS-T3 患者的生存状况相当。UICC ⅢB 期由两个亚组组成:U-T2N1(18 例)和 U-T3N1(21 例)。它们的 5 年生存率分别为 85%和 41%(P=0.01)。后者与 28 例 T3N0 患者(35%,P=0.93)相当。局限于 PSPLN 的 UICC-M1 患者的生存状况明显优于超出 PSPLN 范围的患者(5 年生存率 35%对 17%;P=0.04)。

结论

尽管 UICC 分期更准确地定义了 T 分期,但 JSBS 分期更好地分层了胆囊癌患者的预后,主要是因为 UICC ⅢB 期包括 T1/2N1M0,与 T3N0M0 相比,其生存率显著提高。将 PSPLN 归类为区域淋巴结更为合适。

相似文献

1
Definition of T3/4 and regional lymph nodes in gallbladder cancer: which is more valid, the UICC or the Japanese staging system?胆囊癌 T3/4 及区域淋巴结定义:UICC 与日本分期系统,哪个更合理?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(11):3567-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2599-5. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
2
Prognostic heterogeneity of the seventh edition of UICC Stage III gallbladder carcinoma: Which patients benefit from surgical resection?国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第7版Ⅲ期胆囊癌的预后异质性:哪些患者能从手术切除中获益?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):780-787. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
3
Role of surgery for gallbladder carcinoma with special reference to lymph node metastasis and stage using western and Japanese classification systems.胆囊癌手术的作用,特别参考西方和日本分类系统中关于淋巴结转移和分期的情况。
World J Surg. 2000 Oct;24(10):1271-6; discussion 1277. doi: 10.1007/s002680010253.
4
Aggressive surgical approach for stage IV gallbladder carcinoma based on Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery classification.基于日本胆道外科学会分类的IV期胆囊癌积极手术治疗方法
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(4):358-65. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1188-z. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
5
[Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].[UICC与JGCA胃癌淋巴结分期标准的预后价值比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 May;30(5):376-80.
6
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
7
Outcomes of radical surgery for gallbladder cancer patients with lymphatic metastases.胆囊癌伴淋巴转移患者根治性手术的疗效。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug;41(8):992-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr072. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Outcome of radical surgery for stage IV gallbladder carcinoma.IV期胆囊癌根治性手术的结果
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(4):345-50. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1186-1. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
9
[Clinical implications of the new TNM staging system for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌新TNM分期系统的临床意义]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;33(9):687-91.
10
Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparable impact of lymph node metastases in T2 gallbladder cancer on postoperative prognosis irrespective of the extent of the metastases: A retrospective analysis.T2期胆囊癌中淋巴结转移对术后预后的类似影响,无论转移范围如何:一项回顾性分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Jun;32(6):443-451. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12140. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
Short- and Long-term Surgical Results of Extended Surgery for Widespread Gallbladder Carcinoma.广泛性胆囊癌扩大手术的短期和长期手术结果
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1022-1032. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13907.
3
Progress in gallbladder cancer with lymph node metastasis.
伴有淋巴结转移的胆囊癌的进展
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 22;12:966835. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.966835. eCollection 2022.
4
Early Recurrence in Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma: Clinical Impact and Its Preoperative Predictive Score.切除术后胆囊癌的早期复发:临床影响及其术前预测评分。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5447-5457. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11937-y. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
5
Protocol for a gallbladder cancer registry study in China: the Chinese Research Group of Gallbladder Cancer (CRGGC) study.中国胆囊癌登记研究方案:中国胆囊癌研究组(CRGGC)研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e038634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038634.
6
Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages.基于T和N分期不同组合的AJCC III期胆囊癌切除术后生存分析。
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2015 Feb;19(1):11-6. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.11. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
7
Patterns of failure and determinants of outcomes following radical re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer.意外胆囊癌根治性再次切除术后的失败模式及预后决定因素
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):484-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2266-4.