Milavec Helena, Gruber Andreas, Schuster Ernst, Lahnsteiner Eva, Dorfer Christian, Krawagna Maximilian, Knosp Engelbert, Sherif Camillo
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;115:119-23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1192-5_25.
Endovascular coil occlusion of ruptured cerebral aneurysms has a higher rate of rebleeding compared to surgical clipping. Initial aneurysm coil occlusion rate (OR) is the strongest available predictor of aneurysm rebleeding. Standard clinical subjective occlusion rating (SOR) is limited by subjective bias. Therefore, computerized occlusion rating (COR) was introduced. Its superiority was established for experimental and human aneurysms. In the present clinical study, we aimed to evaluate COR as a risk factor for postprocedural reruptures (PPRs) and intraprocedural reruptures (IPRs). In our series of 249 consecutive patients treated in our institution, we observed 7 (2.8%) cases with IPR and 7 (2.8%) cases with PPR. These patients were analyzed in the present study. Mean COR value was 85% (range 71-96%). In 12 (85.7%) cases, COR was lower than SOR. In aneurysms with a COR of 95% or higher, no PPR occurred. All patients with IPR harbored multiple aneurysms. In -conclusion, our data showed a distinct tendency of potentially dangerous overestimations when using SOR compared to the objectively measured COR values. IPR was always associated with multiple aneurysms.
与外科夹闭术相比,破裂性脑动脉瘤的血管内弹簧圈栓塞再出血率更高。初始动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞率(OR)是动脉瘤再出血最强有力的现有预测指标。标准临床主观栓塞评级(SOR)受主观偏差限制。因此,引入了计算机化栓塞评级(COR)。其优越性已在实验性和人体动脉瘤中得到证实。在本临床研究中,我们旨在评估COR作为术后再破裂(PPR)和术中再破裂(IPR)的危险因素。在我们机构连续治疗的249例患者中,我们观察到7例(2.8%)发生IPR,7例(2.8%)发生PPR。本研究对这些患者进行了分析。COR平均值为85%(范围71 - 96%)。在12例(85.7%)病例中,COR低于SOR。在COR为95%或更高的动脉瘤中,未发生PPR。所有发生IPR的患者都有多个动脉瘤。总之,我们的数据显示,与客观测量的COR值相比,使用SOR时存在明显的潜在危险高估倾向。IPR总是与多个动脉瘤相关。