Suppr超能文献

氧气联合一氧化氮与地尔硫䓬对急性肺血管作用的差异:对肺动脉高压长期治疗的启示

Differences in the acute pulmonary vascular effects of oxygen with nitric oxide and diltiazem: implications for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

作者信息

Day Ronald W

机构信息

University of Utah and Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, USA.

出版信息

Congenit Heart Dis. 2013 Jan-Feb;8(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00704.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Right heart catheterization is performed in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to determine the severity of disease and their pulmonary vascular reactivity. This study sought to determine whether the acute pulmonary vasodilatory effects of diltiazem and oxygen with nitric oxide are similar enough to support the practice of using nitric oxide as a surrogate agent to identify patients to treat with an oral calcium channel blocker alone.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

A tertiary medical center for children.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four individuals (7 months to 17 years of age) with pulmonary arterial hypertension who met criteria for a favorable acute pulmonary vasodilatory response to oxygen with nitric oxide, and were also evaluated with intravenous diltiazem.

INTERVENTIONS

Right heart catheterization and an evaluation of pulmonary vascular reactivity.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The pulmonary vasodilatory effects of oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and intravenous diltiazem; and the need for medications other than amlodipine to decrease long-term pulmonary arterial pressure.

RESULTS

Oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and diltiazem acutely decreased pulmonary arterial pressure. Diltiazem also decreased systemic arterial pressure. A lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure was achieved with oxygen and nitric oxide than with diltiazem (30 ± 2 mm Hg vs. 39 ± 3 mm Hg, P< .05). Half of the patients who were treated long term with amlodipine alone failed to develop a long-term 20% decrease in pulmonary arterial pressure and were treated with additional medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxygen and nitric oxide decreased pulmonary arterial pressure more than a dose of intravenous diltiazem that was large enough to decrease systemic arterial pressure. Oxygen and nitric oxide may identify patients who can be treated safely with a calcium channel blocker; however, they should not be used as surrogates to identify patients to treat with a calcium channel blocker alone.

摘要

目的

对肺动脉高压患者进行右心导管检查,以确定疾病的严重程度及其肺血管反应性。本研究旨在确定地尔硫䓬与氧气联合一氧化氮的急性肺血管舒张作用是否足够相似,以支持将一氧化氮用作替代药物来识别仅需口服钙通道阻滞剂治疗的患者的做法。

设计

回顾性描述性研究。

地点

一家儿童三级医疗中心。

患者

24名(7个月至17岁)肺动脉高压患者,符合对氧气联合一氧化氮有良好急性肺血管舒张反应的标准,并且也接受了静脉用地尔硫䓬的评估。

干预措施

右心导管检查及肺血管反应性评估。

观察指标

氧气、氧气联合一氧化氮及静脉用地尔硫䓬的肺血管舒张作用;以及除氨氯地平外降低长期肺动脉压所需的其他药物。

结果

氧气、氧气联合一氧化氮及地尔硫䓬均可急性降低肺动脉压。地尔硫䓬还可降低体动脉压。与地尔硫䓬相比,氧气联合一氧化氮可使平均肺动脉压更低(30±2mmHg对39±3mmHg,P<0.05)。仅接受氨氯地平长期治疗的患者中有一半未能使肺动脉压长期降低20%,并接受了其他药物治疗。

结论

氧气联合一氧化氮降低肺动脉压的作用大于足以降低体动脉压的静脉用地尔硫䓬剂量。氧气和一氧化氮可能识别出可安全使用钙通道阻滞剂治疗的患者;然而,它们不应被用作识别仅需用钙通道阻滞剂治疗的患者的替代物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验