• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双力咬位矫正器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错牙合的前瞻性研究:牙颌变化。

Prospective study of dentoskeletal changes in Class II division malocclusion treatment with twin force bite corrector.

机构信息

Orthodontic Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):319-26. doi: 10.2319/042312-339.1. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

DOI:10.2319/042312-339.1
PMID:22891750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8793647/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dentoskeletal changes of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Force Bite Corrector (TFBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised 86 lateral cephalograms obtained from 43 subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion; the subjects were divided into two groups. The experimental group comprised 23 patients with a mean initial age of 12.11 years who were treated with the TFBC for a mean period of 2.19 years. The control group included 40 lateral cephalograms from 20 Class II nontreated patients, with an initial mean age of 12.55 years and a mean observation period of 2.19 years. The lateral cephalograms were evaluated before and after orthodontic treatment in group 1 and in the beginning and end of the observation period in group 2. t-Tests were used to compare the initial and final cephalometric characteristics of the groups as well as the amount of change.

RESULTS

The experimental group presented greater maxillary growth restriction and mandibular retrusion than the control group, as well as greater maxillomandibular relationship improvement and greater labial tipping of the mandibular incisors. The results also showed a greater decrease in overbite and overjet in the experimental group, and there were no statistically significant differences in the craniofacial growth pattern between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The TFBC promotes restriction of anterior maxillary displacement without significant changes in mandibular length and position and improvement of maxillomandibular relationship without changes in facial growth and significant buccal tipping of mandibular incisors. Class II correction with the TFBC occurred primarily as a result of dentoalveolar changes.

摘要

目的

评估 Twin Force Bite Corrector(TFBC)治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)的牙颌面变化。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 86 例来自 43 名安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)患者的侧位头颅侧位片,将患者分为两组。实验组 23 例,平均初始年龄为 12.11 岁,使用 TFBC 治疗,平均治疗时间为 2.19 年。对照组包括 20 例未经治疗的安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者的 40 例侧位头颅侧位片,平均初始年龄为 12.55 岁,平均观察时间为 2.19 年。实验组在正畸治疗前后和对照组在观察开始和结束时进行侧位头颅侧位片评估。使用 t 检验比较两组的初始和最终头影测量特征以及变化量。

结果

实验组的上颌生长受限和下颌后缩程度大于对照组,同时上颌下颌关系改善和下颌切牙唇倾程度也更大。结果还显示实验组的覆(牙合)和覆盖减小程度更大,但两组的颅面生长模式无统计学差异。

结论

TFBC 可促进上颌前牙位置的限制,而不显著改变下颌长度和位置,改善上颌下颌关系,不改变面型生长,下颌切牙显著唇倾。TFBC 治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)主要是由于牙颌变化引起的。

相似文献

1
Prospective study of dentoskeletal changes in Class II division malocclusion treatment with twin force bite corrector.双力咬位矫正器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错牙合的前瞻性研究:牙颌变化。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):319-26. doi: 10.2319/042312-339.1. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
2
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Jasper Jumper矫治器和颈带矫治器引起的牙颌面变化,随后进行固定正畸治疗。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028.
3
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.二类错(牙合)患者 Jasper Jumper 与 Twin Force Bite Corrector 矫治器的牙颌骨和软组织变化比较:一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.双阻板矫治器和下颌前导矫治器在安氏II类错颌畸形矫治中的作用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Feb;163(2):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.09.021. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
5
Class II malocclusion treatment with the Herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak.生长高峰期后使用Herbst矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合畸形患者。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Sep-Oct;18(5):38-45. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000500008.
6
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.固定正畸治疗前 Jasper 跳弓和激活头帽联合矫形器对牙颌骨骼的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May;143(5):684-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009.
7
Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated Class II sample: a preliminary report.与未经治疗的安氏II类样本相比,双力矫治器与肌激动器的治疗效果:初步报告
Aust Orthod J. 2014 May;30(1):45-53.
8
Eruption Guidance Appliance effects in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.矫治引导装置在治疗安氏II类1分类错牙合中的作用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Feb;117(2):119-29. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70222-8.
9
Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.双力咬位矫正器矫治替牙期和恒牙期安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]的机制。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):718-27. doi: 10.2319/090412-709.1. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance.方丝弓矫治器的Ⅱ类矫治效果
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Jun;25(3):301-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.301.

引用本文的文献

1
Dentoskeletal effects of the cast-splint Herbst, twin-block, and twin-force bite corrector devices used to correct class II malocclusion : Three-year follow-up.用于矫正II类错牙合畸形的铸造夹板式Herbst矫治器、双阻板矫治器和双力咬矫正器的牙颌面效应:三年随访
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00591-0.
2
Assessment of the condylar response of two differently anchored fixed functional appliances in class II malocclusion in young adult orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial.年轻成人正畸患者安氏II类错牙合中两种不同锚固方式的固定功能矫治器髁突反应的评估:一项随机临床试验。
J Orthod Sci. 2024 Feb 16;13:3. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_112_23. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of initial lip competence on the outcome of class II functional appliances therapy.初唇闭合能力对 II 类功能矫治器治疗效果的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 30;28(2):126. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05511-x.
4
Attractiveness of the facial profile: comparison of Class II patients treated with Twin Force® or intermaxillary elastics.面型吸引力:用 Twin Force® 或颌间橡皮圈治疗的 II 类患者的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Oct 15;26(5):e212014. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e212014.oar. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 appliance on cephalometric indices in patients with Class II division 1 versus division 2 malocclusions: A preliminary before-after clinical trial.萨巴赫通用弹簧2矫治器对安氏II类1分类与2分类错牙合畸形患者头影测量指标的影响:一项前后对照的初步临床试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 May 24;18:38. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with three types of fixed functional appliances.三种固定功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合的效果
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Nov 11;24(5):30-39. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.030-039.oar. eCollection 2019.
7
Orthodontic Class II:1 treatment-efficiency and outcome quality of Herbst-multibracket appliance therapy.骨性Ⅱ类:1. Herbst 多用途矫正器治疗的疗效和治疗结果质量。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2005-2011. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2294-9. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Class II Young Adult Treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: 10-Year Follow-up.使用双力咬合矫正器对青少年进行II类错合治疗:10年随访
Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):490-495. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_502_17.
9
Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study.临床对称患者全脸与半脸CBCT头颅侧位片的比较:一项初步研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):83-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.083-089.oar.
10
Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.II类固定功能矫治器治疗的稳定性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.使用悬臂式咬合跳跃器进行二类错颌矫治。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Mar;79(2):221-9. doi: 10.2319/121807-591.1.
2
Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics.使用Forsus抗疲劳装置与颌间弹力牵引治疗的II类不拔牙患者。
Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):332-8. doi: 10.2319/030607-115.1.
3
Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.1期和2期矫治方案治疗安氏II类1分类错牙合的咬合效果及效率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.042.
4
Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.II类错(牙合)治疗的时机:比较一期治疗和二期治疗的骨骼变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046.
5
Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.使用头帽-肌激动器联合矫治器继以方丝弓矫治器治疗安氏II类1分类错牙合的稳定性
Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):594-604. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0594:SOCIDT>2.0.CO;2.
6
Class II correction with the Twin Force Bite Corrector.使用双力咬合矫正器进行II类错颌矫正。
J Clin Orthod. 2004 Apr;38(4):232-40.
7
A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.混合牙列期Herbst矫治器治疗的头影测量与断层扫描评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Oct;116(4):435-43. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70230-1.
8
Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.Herbst矫治器治疗中颞下颌关节的生长适应性:一项前瞻性磁共振成像和头影测量X线摄影研究
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Aug;20(4):375-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.4.375.
9
The Eureka Spring: a new interarch force delivery system.尤里卡弹簧:一种新型的牙弓间力传递系统。
J Clin Orthod. 1997 Jul;31(7):454-67.
10
The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study.Herbst矫治器的头帽效应:一项头影测量长期研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jun;103(6):510-20. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70090-B.