Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):760-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01911.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
The Tiwi people of northern Australia have managed natural resources continuously for 6000-8000 years. Tiwi management objectives and outcomes may reflect how they gather information about the environment. We qualitatively analyzed Tiwi documents and management techniques to examine the relation between the social and physical environment of decision makers and their decision-making strategies. We hypothesized that principles of bounded rationality, namely, the use of efficient rules to navigate complex decision problems, explain how Tiwi managers use simple decision strategies (i.e., heuristics) to make robust decisions. Tiwi natural resource managers reduced complexity in decision making through a process that gathers incomplete and uncertain information to quickly guide decisions toward effective outcomes. They used management feedback to validate decisions through an information loop that resulted in long-term sustainability of environmental use. We examined the Tiwi decision-making processes relative to management of barramundi (Lates calcarifer) fisheries and contrasted their management with the state government's management of barramundi. Decisions that enhanced the status of individual people and their attainment of aspiration levels resulted in reliable resource availability for Tiwi consumers. Different decision processes adopted by the state for management of barramundi may not secure similarly sustainable outcomes.
澳大利亚北部的提维人已经持续管理自然资源 6000-8000 年了。提维人的管理目标和结果可能反映了他们如何收集有关环境的信息。我们对提维人的文件和管理技术进行了定性分析,以检验决策者的社会和物理环境与其决策策略之间的关系。我们假设,有限理性原则,即使用有效的规则来解决复杂的决策问题,可以解释提维管理者如何使用简单的决策策略(即启发式)来做出稳健的决策。提维自然资源管理者通过一个过程来减少决策中的复杂性,这个过程收集不完整和不确定的信息,以快速引导决策走向有效的结果。他们利用管理反馈通过信息循环来验证决策,从而实现环境使用的长期可持续性。我们考察了提维人的决策过程相对于巴伦鱼(Lates calcarifer)渔业的管理,并将其管理与州政府的巴伦鱼管理进行了对比。那些提高个人地位和实现抱负水平的决策,为提维消费者提供了可靠的资源供应。州政府为管理巴伦鱼而采用的不同决策过程可能无法确保同样可持续的结果。