Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, D-13353, Germany.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Dec;14(12):1374-88. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs123. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
Prolongation of waiting times for heart transplantation (HTx) increases the need for new therapies. In short-term follow-up studies, immunoadsorption (IA) appeared beneficial in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) associated with β(1)-adrenoreceptor-autoantibodies (β(1)-AABs). This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefits of IA in HTx candidates with DCM, patients' responsiveness to IA, and the impact of β(1)-AAB removal on IA results.
In a single-centre retrospective study of prospectively gathered information we evaluated all β(1)-AAB-positive and -negative HTx candidates with end-stage DCM [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%] who underwent IA between 1995 and 2005 (follow-up thereafter: 5.3-14.7 years). As controls we used all β(1)-AAB-positive DCM patients referred for HTx during the same time period who received no IA therapy. We also looked for differences in efficacy between unspecific IA (unselective antibody removal) and specific IA (selective β(1)-AAB removal). The main outcome measures were cardiac function and HTx/ventricular assist device (VAD)-free patient survival. The probability for 5-year HTx/VAD-free survival for the108 β(1)-AAB-positive DCM patients who underwent unspecific IA reached 69.4 ± 4.4% and was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than for both β(1)-AAB-positive DCM patients without IA (25.4 ± 11.4%) and β(1)-AAB-negative DCM patients who also underwent IA (47.4 ± 11.5). In patients with high β(1)-AAB levels, unspecific and specific IA showed the same high efficiency in β(1)-AAB removal. LVEF and New York Heart Assocation class improved (P < 0.01) after both, but without differences in improvement after specific or unspecific IA. The prevalence of responders to specific and unspecific IA was similar (78.3% vs. 79.6%). In 76% of the patients with β(1)-AAB reappearance, redetection of AABs coincided with worsening of cardiac function.
Removal of β(1)-AABs by specific or unspecific IA can improve cardiac function allowing long-term stability in end-stage DCM, which can spare many patients from HTx or will delay HTx listing for years. In β(1)-AAB-positive DCM patients the benefits of IA appeared to be associated with the removal of these antibodies.
心脏移植(HTx)等待时间的延长增加了对新疗法的需求。在短期随访研究中,免疫吸附(IA)似乎对β(1)-肾上腺素能受体自身抗体(β(1)-AAB)相关扩张型心肌病(DCM)有益。本研究旨在探讨 IA 在 HTx 候选者 DCM 中的长期益处、患者对 IA 的反应性以及β(1)-AAB 去除对 IA 结果的影响。
在一项前瞻性收集信息的单中心回顾性研究中,我们评估了所有接受 IA 治疗的终末期 DCM [左心室射血分数(LVEF)<30%]的β(1)-AAB 阳性和阴性 HTx 候选者(随访时间:5.3-14.7 年)。作为对照,我们使用了在同一时期因 HTx 而接受 IA 治疗的所有β(1)-AAB 阳性 DCM 患者。我们还研究了非特异性 IA(非选择性抗体去除)和特异性 IA(选择性β(1)-AAB 去除)之间疗效的差异。主要观察指标为心功能和 HTx/心室辅助装置(VAD)-无患者生存率。接受非特异性 IA 的 108 例β(1)-AAB 阳性 DCM 患者的 5 年 HTx/VAD 无生存概率为 69.4±4.4%,明显高于未接受 IA 的β(1)-AAB 阳性 DCM 患者(25.4±11.4%)和接受 IA 的β(1)-AAB 阴性 DCM 患者(47.4±11.5%)(P<0.05)。在β(1)-AAB 水平较高的患者中,非特异性和特异性 IA 对β(1)-AAB 的去除均具有相同的高效性。LVEF 和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级均有改善(P<0.01),但特异性和非特异性 IA 后改善无差异。特异性和非特异性 IA 的反应者比例相似(78.3%比 79.6%)。在 76%的β(1)-AAB 再次出现的患者中,AAB 的重新检测与心功能恶化同时发生。
通过特异性或非特异性 IA 去除β(1)-AAB 可改善心功能,使终末期 DCM 长期稳定,使许多患者免于 HTx 或延迟 HTx 数年。在β(1)-AAB 阳性 DCM 患者中,IA 的益处似乎与这些抗体的去除有关。