Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficiencies of different irrigation solutions in the removal of calcium hydroxide (CH).
Forty-eight maxillary central incisor teeth were used. Root canals were prepared with the ProTaper system (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland). Five milliliters 2% NaOCl, 5 mL 17% EDTA, and 10 mL saline were used for final irrigation. The canals were filled with CH paste. Specimens were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n = 10) according to irrigation protocols. Positive and negative control groups (n = 4) were used. Group 1 used 2.5 mL 17% EDTA, group 2 used 2.5 mL 2.5% NaOCl + 2.5 mL 17% EDTA, group 3 used 2.5 mL 1% peracetic acid (PAA), and group 4 used 2.5 mL 0.5% PAA. The specimens were evaluated with scanning electron microscope analysis and scored. Kruskal-Wallis and Student Newman-Keuls post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.
In the apical thirds, 1% PAA was superior to the other groups (P < .05); however, there were no significant differences among the other groups (P > .05). In the middle thirds, no significant differences were found among the groups (P > .05). In the coronal thirds, 1% PAA was superior to the other groups. There were significant differences among all the other groups (P < .05).
According to the findings of the present study, 1% PAA could be recommended for the removal of CH from the root canals.
本研究的目的是评估不同冲洗液在清除氢氧化钙(CH)方面的效率。
使用 48 颗上颌中切牙。使用 Protaper 系统(Dentsply Maillefer,Baillagues,瑞士)进行根管预备。最后冲洗使用 5 毫升 2%次氯酸钠、5 毫升 17% EDTA 和 10 毫升生理盐水。根管内填充 CH 糊剂。根据冲洗方案将标本随机分为 4 个实验组(n = 10)。阳性和阴性对照组(n = 4)也同时使用。第 1 组使用 2.5 毫升 17% EDTA,第 2 组使用 2.5 毫升 2.5%次氯酸钠+2.5 毫升 17% EDTA,第 3 组使用 2.5 毫升 1%过氧乙酸(PAA),第 4 组使用 2.5 毫升 0.5% PAA。使用扫描电子显微镜分析和评分评估标本。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Student-Newman-Keuls 事后检验进行统计学分析。
在根尖三分之一处,1% PAA 优于其他组(P <.05);然而,其他组之间没有显著差异(P >.05)。在中三分之一处,各组之间没有发现显著差异(P >.05)。在冠三分之一处,1% PAA 优于其他组。所有其他组之间都有显著差异(P <.05)。
根据本研究的结果,1% PAA 可推荐用于清除根管内的 CH。