• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两阶段连续再评估方法中先验和骨架的相互作用。

Interplay of priors and skeletons in two-stage continual reassessment method.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4321-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.5559. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5559
PMID:22893483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3538840/
Abstract

Model-based dose-finding designs such as the continual reassessment method (CRM) rely on some basic working model. In the Bayesian setting, these take the form of 'guess estimates' of the probabilities of toxicity at each level. In the likelihood setting, these estimates simply take the form of a model as operational characteristics are unaffected by arbitrary positive power transformations. These initial estimates are often referred to as the model skeleton. The impact of any prior distribution on the model parameter that describes the dose-toxicity curve will itself depend on the skeleton being used. We study the interplay between prior assumptions and skeleton choice in the context of two-stage CRM designs. We consider the behavior of a two-stage design at the point of transition from a 3 + 3 design to CRM. We study how use can be made of stage 1 data to construct a more efficient skeleton in conjunction with any prior information through an example of a clinical trial. We evaluate to what extent stage 1 data might be down weighted when the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is far from the starting level and stage 1 data is strongly informative. The results show no improvement in accuracy; thus, weighting is not necessary unless the investigators feel strongly about the location of the MTD and wish to accelerate into the vicinity of the MTD. In general, because this information is not available, we recommend that the design of two-stage trials utilize stage 1 data to establish a skeleton.

摘要

基于模型的剂量探索设计,如连续再评估方法(CRM),依赖于一些基本的工作模型。在贝叶斯设置中,这些模型以“毒性概率的猜测估计”的形式出现,这些概率估计来自于每个水平的毒性概率的猜测估计。在似然设置中,这些估计只是模型的形式,因为操作特征不受任意正幂变换的影响。这些初始估计通常被称为模型骨架。任何先验分布对描述剂量-毒性曲线的模型参数的影响都将取决于所使用的骨架。我们在两阶段 CRM 设计的背景下研究了先验假设和骨架选择之间的相互作用。我们研究了在从 3+3 设计过渡到 CRM 时,两阶段设计的行为。我们通过临床试验的例子,研究了如何利用阶段 1 数据,结合任何先验信息,构建一个更有效的骨架。我们评估了在最大耐受剂量(MTD)远离起始水平且阶段 1 数据信息量很大的情况下,阶段 1 数据可能会被多大程度地下调权重。结果表明,在准确性方面没有提高;因此,除非调查人员强烈认为 MTD 的位置并希望加速进入 MTD 附近,否则不需要进行权重调整。一般来说,由于这种信息不可用,我们建议两阶段试验的设计利用阶段 1 数据来建立骨架。

相似文献

1
Interplay of priors and skeletons in two-stage continual reassessment method.两阶段连续再评估方法中先验和骨架的相互作用。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4321-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.5559. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.评估肿瘤 1 期临床试验剂量递增阶段的各种连续再评估方法模型:使用真实临床数据和模拟研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07703-6.
3
Continual reassessment method for dose escalation clinical trials in oncology: a comparison of prior skeleton approaches using AZD3514 data.肿瘤学剂量递增临床试验的连续重新评估方法:使用AZD3514数据对先前框架方法的比较
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 31;16(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2702-6.
4
Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.两阶段连续重新评估方法相对于最佳基准的性能。
Clin Trials. 2013;10(6):862-75. doi: 10.1177/1740774513503521. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
A novel model of the continual reassessment method in Phase I trial.一种新型的 I 期临床试验连续评估法模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 28;13(1):5047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28148-4.
6
A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.一种为I期临床试验的贝叶斯模型平均连续重新评估法指定骨架的默认方法。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):266-279. doi: 10.1002/sim.6941. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.序贯毒性分级剂量发现临床试验设计:连续评估法的扩展。
Clin Trials. 2012 Jun;9(3):303-13. doi: 10.1177/1740774512443593. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors.借鉴历史信息,利用荟萃分析预测先验来改进I期临床试验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jan 2;32(1):34-52. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2058526. Epub 2022 May 20.
9
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Bayesian hybrid dose-finding design in phase I oncology clinical trials.贝叶斯混合剂量探索设计在肿瘤 I 期临床试验中的应用。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2098-108. doi: 10.1002/sim.4164. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.评估肿瘤 1 期临床试验剂量递增阶段的各种连续再评估方法模型:使用真实临床数据和模拟研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07703-6.
2
A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method.一种新的实用设计,用于使用适应性连续评估方法在 I 期临床试验中进行剂量递增。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5801-3.
3
Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.部分有序组中剂量探索的转换模型。
Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):32-40. doi: 10.1177/1740774518801599. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
Integrating the escalation and dose expansion studies into a unified Phase I clinical trial.将剂量递增和剂量扩展研究整合到一项统一的I期临床试验中。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Scientific Review of Phase I Protocols With Novel Dose-Escalation Designs: How Much Information Is Needed?具有新型剂量递增设计的I期试验方案的科学综述:需要多少信息?
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2221-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8466. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Bridging Solutions in Dose Finding Problems.剂量探索问题中的桥接解决方案
Stat Biopharm Res. 2014 May 1;6(2):185-197. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2014.906365.
8
pocrm: an R-package for phase I trials of combinations of agents.pocrm:用于联合用药的 I 期临床试验的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Oct;112(1):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.双药物Ⅰ期剂量递增研究的适应性设计。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 May;10(5):277-88. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.35. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.将较低级别毒性信息纳入剂量发现设计中。
Clin Trials. 2011 Aug;8(4):370-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511410732.
2
Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.贝叶斯工作模型选择的连续再评估方法中的后验最大化和平均化。
Stat Med. 2011 Jun 15;30(13):1563-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.4054. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
3
Estimating the dose-toxicity curve in completed phase I studies.估算已完成的 I 期研究中的剂量-毒性曲线。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2117-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.4206. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
4
Retrospective robustness of the continual reassessment method.连续重新评估法的回顾性稳健性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Sep;20(5):1013-25. doi: 10.1080/10543400903315732.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Prior Assumptions in Bayesian Biostatistics.评估先验假设在贝叶斯生物统计学中的影响。
Stat Biosci. 2010 Jul 1;2(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12561-010-9018-x.
6
Comparison of Isotonic Designs for Dose-Finding.剂量探索等渗设计的比较
Stat Biopharm Res. 2009 Feb 1;1(1):101. doi: 10.1198/sbr.2009.0010.
7
Choice of starting dose for molecularly targeted agents evaluated in first-in-human phase I cancer clinical trials.在首次人体 I 期癌症临床试验中评估的分子靶向药物的起始剂量选择。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1401-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9606. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
8
A two-stage algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials for two new molecular entities.用于两种新分子实体的 I 期癌症临床试验设计的两阶段算法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Jan;31(1):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
9
Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.序贯评估法中的模型校准
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105076.
10
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.I期癌症临床试验中的剂量递增方法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.