• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开腹与机器人辅助保肛直肠癌手术:100 例匹配患者组的技术和结局比较。

Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients.

机构信息

Medical Faculties and Associates, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2012 Dec;8(4):468-75. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1452. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.1452
PMID:22893623
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although open resection using a sphincter-saving operation (SSO) remains the standard of care for rectal cancer, few studies have compared open and robot-assisted (RA) SSOs. This study aimed to compare the operative features, functional outcomes, and oncological validity of open and RA SSO for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 200 rectal cancer patients undergoing curative SSO were enrolled prospectively. The open and RA groups (n = 100, respectively) were matched for clinical stage and operation type.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was significantly longer in the RA group than in the open group (188 vs. 103 min, P < 0.001), but it was significantly reduced in the latter half of the RA patients compared with that in the first half (164 vs. 214 min, P < 0.001). The mean distal resection margin was significantly longer in the RA than in the open group (2.7 vs. 1.9 cm; P = 0.001), but only one patient in either group had positive circumferential resection margin. Bowel peristalsis returned one day earlier in the RA than in the open group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complication rates and anorectal functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The operator's physical discomfort, assessed on a visual analog scale, was significantly lower in the RA than in the open group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this short-term study, the RA SSO showed equivalent oncological safety, functional outcome, and morbidities to open SSO. Although the operation takes longer, the robotic system enables a technically versatile SSO with fine dissection in a limited surgical field.

摘要

背景

尽管采用保肛手术(SSO)的开放性切除术仍然是直肠癌的标准治疗方法,但很少有研究比较过开放性和机器人辅助(RA)SSO。本研究旨在比较直肠癌开放性和 RA SSO 的手术特点、功能结果和肿瘤学有效性。

方法

前瞻性纳入 200 例接受根治性 SSO 的直肠癌患者。开放性和 RA 组(n=100)分别按临床分期和手术类型匹配。

结果

RA 组的平均手术时间明显长于开放性组(188 分钟比 103 分钟,P<0.001),但在 RA 患者的后半段明显短于前半段(164 分钟比 214 分钟,P<0.001)。RA 组的远端切缘明显长于开放性组(2.7 厘米比 1.9 厘米;P=0.001),但两组中只有 1 例患者的环周切缘阳性。RA 组的肠蠕动恢复时间早于开放性组(P<0.001)。两组术后并发症发生率和肛肠功能结果相当。RA 组操作者的身体不适评分明显低于开放性组(P<0.001)。

结论

根据这项短期研究,RA SSO 显示出与开放性 SSO 相当的肿瘤学安全性、功能结果和发病率。虽然手术时间较长,但机器人系统能够在有限的手术区域进行精细解剖,实现技术多样化的 SSO。

相似文献

1
Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients.开腹与机器人辅助保肛直肠癌手术:100 例匹配患者组的技术和结局比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2012 Dec;8(4):468-75. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1452. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
3
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopically assisted surgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a single-center experience.新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜辅助直肠癌手术的短期疗效:单中心经验。
J Surg Res. 2014 Apr;187(2):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.10.039. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与开腹手术比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02528.x.
5
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study.机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术:一项病例对照研究的短期结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Feb;54(2):151-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fec4fd.
6
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
7
[Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for the middle-lower rectal cancer: a clinical comparative study].腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):573-6.
8
Comparative analysis focusing on surgical and early oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopy-assisted, and robot-assisted approaches in rectal cancer patients.聚焦直肠癌患者开放手术、腹腔镜辅助手术及机器人辅助手术的手术及早期肿瘤学结局的对比分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1179-87. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2586-6. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.机器人辅助的括约肌间切除术有助于低位直肠癌患者高效地保留括约肌。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1137-1145. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2807-7. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Use of smooth muscle plasty after intersphincteric rectal resection to replace a partially resected internal anal sphincter: long-term follow-up.经肛门直肠内括约肌部分切除术后应用平滑肌成形术替代部分切除的内括约肌:长期随访结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Nov;52(11):1895-901. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b55507.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted surgery for acute abdominal emergencies: a systematic review of 1142 cases.机器人辅助手术治疗急性腹部急症:1142例病例的系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 5;19(1):558. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02657-y.
2
Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec 21;39(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04579-3.
3
Neutropenic Diet Cannot Reduce the Risk of Infection and Mortality in Oncology Patients With Neutropenia.
中性粒细胞减少饮食不能降低肿瘤中性粒细胞减少患者的感染风险和死亡率。
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 9;12:836371. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836371. eCollection 2022.
4
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Hype or Hope? (Indian Experience).直肠癌的机器人手术:炒作还是希望?(印度经验)
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):604-612. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01113-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences and Future Perspectives.机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:当前证据与未来展望
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;36(5):293-303. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.06.16. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
6
The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery.达芬奇Xi系统:对其在机器人结直肠手术中的功能、通用性及潜在作用的综述
Robot Surg. 2017 Jul 28;4:77-85. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S119317. eCollection 2017.
7
Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.卵巢癌的微创间歇性细胞减灭术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0838-x. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Comparative analysis of robot-assisted . open abdominoperineal resection in terms of operative and initial oncological outcomes.机器人辅助开放性腹会阴联合切除术在手术及初始肿瘤学结局方面的比较分析
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Jul;95(1):37-44. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.1.37. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗保留肛门直肠癌的Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Sep 22;13:1247-1257. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S142758. eCollection 2017.
10
Future of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.微创结直肠手术的未来
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Sep;29(3):221-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584499.