Jang Je-Ho, Kim Chang-Nam
Department of Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;36(5):293-303. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.06.16. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
Despite the technical limitations of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) for rectal cancer has short-term advantages over open surgery, but the pathological outcomes reported in randomized clinical trials are still in controversy. Minimally invasive robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) has recently been gaining popularity as robotic surgical systems potentially provide greater benefits than LTME. Compared to LTME, RTME is associated with lower conversion rates and similar or better genitourinary functions, but its long-term oncological outcomes have not been established. Although the operating time of RTME is longer than that of LTME, RTME has a shorter learning curve, is more convenient for surgeons, and is better for sphincter-preserving operations than LTME. The robotic surgical system is a good technical tool for minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, especially in male patients with narrow deep pelvises. Robotic systems and robotic surgical techniques are still improving, and the contribution of RTME to the treatment of rectal cancer will continue to increase in the future.
尽管微创手术存在技术局限性,但腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术(LTME)在短期疗效上优于开放手术,不过随机临床试验报告的病理结果仍存在争议。近年来,微创机器人全直肠系膜切除术(RTME)越来越受欢迎,因为机器人手术系统可能比LTME带来更大的益处。与LTME相比,RTME的中转率更低,泌尿生殖功能相似或更好,但其长期肿瘤学结局尚未明确。虽然RTME的手术时间比LTME长,但RTME的学习曲线更短,对外科医生来说更方便,在保留括约肌手术方面比LTME更好。机器人手术系统是直肠癌微创手术的良好技术工具,尤其适用于骨盆狭窄较深的男性患者。机器人系统和机器人手术技术仍在不断改进,未来RTME对直肠癌治疗的贡献将持续增加。