Zegers Marieke, Wollersheim Hub
Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, afd. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(33):A4768.
Progress in improving patient safety in hospitals has been frustratingly slow, for several reasons. There are, for example, few proven effective improvement interventions available. Evaluation of the effectiveness of safety interventions is complicated by the complexity and variability of these interventions due to local differences and preferences of care providers. In addition, a reduction in avoidable harm is difficult to measure due to the requirement for a large number of patients and lack of reliable instruments for measuring effectiveness. Also, problems experienced by care providers when implementing safety interventions are not being systematically addressed. For these reasons, the aim of the Dutch national safety programme in hospitals - to reduce the incidence of avoidable harm by 50% in 5 years - will not be feasible or measurable. It is necessary to identify effective safety interventions and to exchange experiences in successful implementation of these in order to support care providers in improving patient safety.
由于多种原因,医院在提高患者安全方面的进展一直缓慢得令人沮丧。例如,几乎没有经过验证的有效改进干预措施。由于护理提供者的地区差异和偏好,这些干预措施的复杂性和变异性使得对安全干预措施有效性的评估变得复杂。此外,由于需要大量患者且缺乏可靠的有效性测量工具,难以衡量可避免伤害的减少情况。而且,护理提供者在实施安全干预措施时遇到的问题没有得到系统解决。由于这些原因,荷兰医院国家安全计划的目标——在5年内将可避免伤害的发生率降低50%——将不可行或无法衡量。有必要确定有效的安全干预措施,并交流成功实施这些措施的经验,以支持护理提供者提高患者安全。