Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.
Oncol Rep. 2012 Nov;28(5):1531-6. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1971. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
We have previously classified wall invasion patterns of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) cases into two groups, i.e., the infiltrative growth type (IG type) and destructive growth type (DG type). The DG type was significantly associated with poor differentiation, aggressive infiltration and decreased postoperative survival in terms of its histological differentiation, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph node status, neural invasion and mode of subserosal infiltration. In the present study, we analyzed 42 surgically-resected subserosal invasive gallbladder adenocarcinomas, invading the perimuscular connective tissue (pT2). The cumulative 5-year survival rate in the series was 48.7%. Lymphatic invasion (p=0.021), venous invasion (p=0.020), mode of subserosal infiltration (p<0.001), histological differentiation (p=0.030) and biliary infiltration (p=0.007) were noted, respectively, at a significantly higher incidence in more aggressive infiltration or poor differentiation in the DG type. The cumulative 5-year survival rate of curative resection cases was lower in patients with the DG type than in those with the IG type (68.9 versus 20.2%, respectively, p=0.006, log-rank test). On Cox's proportional hazard regression modeling, the low degree of venous/perineural invasion and IG type of wall invasion pattern were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Our data suggest that the wall invasion pattern is an independent predictor of survival in subserosal invasive GBC. Regarding the clinical application of our concept, on the classification of patients with subserosal invasive GBC based on a combination of the wall invasion pattern and lymph node status, the overall survival rate in patients with the DG type and/or N2 metastasis (n=21) was lower than in patients with the IG type and N0, 1 metastasis (n=21) (p=0.0023, log-rank test). The wall invasion pattern could contribute to decision-making concerning curative resection for subserosal invasive GBC.
我们之前将胆囊癌(GBC)病例的壁侵犯模式分为两组,即浸润性生长型(IG 型)和破坏性生长型(DG 型)。DG 型在组织学分化、淋巴管侵犯、静脉侵犯、淋巴结状态、神经侵犯和浆膜下浸润方式等方面与较差的分化、侵袭性浸润和术后生存时间缩短显著相关。在本研究中,我们分析了 42 例手术切除的侵犯肌层结缔组织的浆膜下浸润性胆囊腺癌(pT2)。该系列的累积 5 年生存率为 48.7%。在 DG 型中,淋巴管侵犯(p=0.021)、静脉侵犯(p=0.020)、浆膜下浸润方式(p<0.001)、组织学分化(p=0.030)和胆系侵犯(p=0.007)的发生率显著更高,提示侵袭性更强或分化更差。在 DG 型中,根治性切除病例的累积 5 年生存率低于 IG 型(分别为 68.9%和 20.2%,p=0.006,对数秩检验)。在 Cox 比例风险回归模型中,低程度的静脉/神经周围侵犯和 IG 型的壁侵犯模式与总生存率的显著改善相关。我们的数据表明,壁侵犯模式是浆膜下浸润性 GBC 生存的独立预测因子。关于我们概念的临床应用,在基于壁侵犯模式和淋巴结状态对浆膜下浸润性 GBC 患者进行分类的情况下,DG 型和/或 N2 转移(n=21)患者的总生存率低于 IG 型和 N0、1 转移(n=21)患者(p=0.0023,对数秩检验)。壁侵犯模式可能有助于决定是否对浆膜下浸润性 GBC 进行根治性切除。