Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya 460-0001, Japan.
Mod Rheumatol. 2013 May;23(3):466-77. doi: 10.1007/s10165-012-0705-y. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
We evaluated patient drug adherence to and efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) based on data collected from approximately 200 patients to retrospectively examine the best use of ADA in Japanese patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) managed in daily practice.
For explorative comparisons, patients were stratified by prior use or no use of biologics (Bio-naïve vs. Bio-switch) and concomitant use (+) or no use (-) of methotrexate (MTX) into four subgroups. The primary efficacy endpoint was extent of improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to 24 weeks assessed as European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response. Secondary endpoints included ADA treatment continuation as represented by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and percentages of patients achieving remission as defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6.
Overall, mean DAS28-ESR significantly decreased from 5.6 ± 1.2 at baseline to 4.1 ± 1.7 at week 24 (p < 0.0001), and >30 % of patients achieved EULAR good response. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the Bio-naïve and MTX (+) subgroup showed the highest EULAR good response rate of 37.3 % at week 24. The three most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were skin allergies such as injection-site reactions, infections, and respiratory disorders such as interstitial lung lesions and organizing pneumonia.
In conclusion, ADA therapy resulted in significant clinical response in established Japanese patients with RA treated in daily practice. It also demonstrated generally good safety and tolerability. It was suggested that the best use of ADA may be in biologically naïve patients with concomitant administration of MTX.
我们评估了约 200 名患者的数据中患者对阿达木单抗(ADA)的药物依从性和疗效及安全性,旨在回顾性地检查 ADA 在日本长期患有类风湿关节炎(RA)的患者中的最佳使用情况,这些患者在日常实践中接受治疗。
为了进行探索性比较,根据既往是否使用生物制剂(生物初治与生物转换)以及是否同时使用(+)或不使用(-)甲氨蝶呤(MTX),将患者分为 4 个亚组。主要疗效终点为基线至 24 周时,用红细胞沉降率(DAS28-ESR)评估欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的达标率(DAS28-ESR 改善程度),以反映疾病活动度 28 个关节评分(DAS28-ESR)的改善程度。次要终点包括 ADA 治疗的持续时间,代表为 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和通过 DAS28-ESR <2.6 定义的达到缓解的患者百分比。
总体而言,DAS28-ESR 从基线的 5.6±1.2 显著降低至 24 周的 4.1±1.7(p<0.0001),>30%的患者达到 EULAR 达标。亚组分析表明,生物初治和 MTX(+)亚组的患者在第 24 周的 EULAR 达标率最高,为 37.3%。最常见的三种不良事件(AE)是皮肤过敏,如注射部位反应、感染以及呼吸障碍,如间质性肺病变和机化性肺炎。
总之,ADA 治疗在日常实践中对日本已确诊的 RA 患者产生了显著的临床疗效,同时具有良好的安全性和耐受性。建议 ADA 的最佳使用可能是在同时使用 MTX 的生物初治患者中。