Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 10-22 Kawado-cho, Shinjuko-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 May;53(5):904-13. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket465. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
The aim of this study was to compare efficacy outcomes of initial treatment with adalimumab + MTX vs adalimumab addition following 26 weeks of MTX monotherapy in Japanese early RA patients naive to MTX with high disease activity.
Patients completing the 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab + MTX were eligible to receive 26 weeks of open-label adalimumab + MTX. Patients were assessed for mean change from baseline in the 28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR) and modified total Sharp score (mTSS), and for the proportions of patients achieving clinical, functional or radiographic remission.
Of 333 patients assessed, 278 (137 from the initial adalimumab + MTX and 141 from the initial placebo + MTX groups) completed the 52-week study. Significant differences in clinical and functional parameters observed during the 26-week blinded period were not apparent following the addition of open-label adalimumab to MTX. Open-label adalimumab + MTX slowed radiographic progression through week 52 in both groups, but patients who received adalimumab + MTX throughout the study exhibited less radiographic progression than those who received placebo + MTX during the first 26 weeks (mean ΔmTSS at week 52 = 2.56 vs 3.30, P < 0.001).
Delayed addition of adalimumab in Japanese MTX-naive early RA patients did not impact clinical and functional outcomes at week 52 compared with the earlier addition of adalimumab. However, the accrual of significant structural damage during blinded placebo + MTX therapy contributed to the persistence of differences between the treatment strategies, suggesting that Japanese patients at risk for aggressive disease should benefit from the early inclusion of adalimumab + MTX combination therapy. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/), NCT00870467.
本研究旨在比较初始阿达木单抗+甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗与 26 周 MTX 单药治疗后加用阿达木单抗在日本初治、高疾病活动度的早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效结局。
完成阿达木单抗+MTX 26 周随机、安慰剂对照试验的患者有资格接受 26 周的开放标签阿达木单抗+MTX 治疗。评估患者从基线开始的 28 个关节疾病活动度(DAS28-红细胞沉降率[ESR])和改良总Sharp 评分(mTSS)的平均变化,以及达到临床、功能或放射学缓解的患者比例。
在 333 例评估患者中,278 例(初始阿达木单抗+MTX 组 137 例,初始安慰剂+MTX 组 141 例)完成了 52 周研究。在 26 周盲法期观察到的临床和功能参数的显著差异在 MTX 加用开放标签阿达木单抗后并不明显。两组患者在第 52 周时,开放标签阿达木单抗+MTX 均减缓了放射学进展,但在整个研究期间接受阿达木单抗+MTX 治疗的患者比在最初 26 周期间接受安慰剂+MTX 治疗的患者放射学进展更少(第 52 周时平均 mTSS 差值=2.56 对 3.30,P<0.001)。
与早期加用阿达木单抗相比,在日本初治、MTX 初治的早期 RA 患者中延迟加用阿达木单抗对第 52 周的临床和功能结局没有影响。然而,在接受盲法安慰剂+MTX 治疗期间出现的大量结构损伤导致两种治疗策略之间的差异持续存在,这表明有侵袭性疾病风险的日本患者应从阿达木单抗+MTX 联合治疗的早期纳入中获益。
ClinicalTrials.gov(http://clinicaltrials.gov/),NCT00870467。