Hughes Richard A C, Mehndiratta Man Mohan
MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD002062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002062.pub2.
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a progressive or relapsing and remitting paralysing illness probably due to an autoimmune response which should benefit from corticosteroids. Non-randomised studies suggest that corticosteroids are beneficial. Two commonly used corticosteroids are prednisone and prednisolone. Both are usually given as oral tablets. Prednisone is converted into prednisolone in the liver so that the effect of the two drugs is usually the same. Another corticosteroid, called dexamethasone, is more potent and is used in smaller doses.
To evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroid treatment compared to placebo or no treatment for CIDP and to compare the efficacy of different corticosteroid regimes.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (20 February 2012), CENTRAL (2012, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2012), and EMBASE (January 1980 to February 2012) for randomised trials of corticosteroids for CIDP.
We included randomised or quasi-randomised trials of treatment with any form of corticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone for CIDP, diagnosed by an internationally accepted definition.
Two authors extracted the data and assessed risk of bias independently. The primary outcome was intended to be change in disability, with secondary outcomes of change in impairment, maximum motor nerve conduction velocity, or compound muscle action potential amplitude after 12 weeks, and adverse events.
In one non-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 35 eligible participants, the primary outcome for this review was not available. Twelve of 19 participants treated with prednisone, compared with five of 16 participants randomised to no treatment, had improved neuropathy impairment scores after 12 weeks; the risk ratio (RR) for improvement was 2.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 4.52). Adverse events were not reported in detail, but one prednisone-treated participant died.In a double-blind RCT comparing daily standard-dose oral prednisolone with monthly high-dose oral dexamethasone in 40 participants, none of the outcomes for this review were available. There were no significant differences in remission (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.45 in favour of monthly dexamethasone) or change in disability or impairment after one year. Eight of 16 in the prednisolone, and seven of 24 in the dexamethasone group deteriorated. Adverse events were similar with each regimen, except that sleeplessness and moon facies (moon-shaped appearance of the face) were significantly less common with monthly dexamethasone.Experience from large non-randomised studies suggests that corticosteroids are beneficial, but long-term use causes serious side effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Very low quality evidence from one small, randomised trial did not show a statistically significant benefit from oral prednisone compared with no treatment. Nevertheless, corticosteroids are commonly used in practice. According to moderate quality evidence from one RCT, the efficacy of high-dose monthly oral dexamethasone was not statistically different from that of daily standard-dose oral prednisolone. Most adverse events occurred with similar frequencies in both groups, but sleeplessness and moon facies were significantly less common with monthly dexamethasone. Further research is needed to identify factors which predict response.
慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)是一种进行性或复发缓解型麻痹性疾病,可能由自身免疫反应引起,使用皮质类固醇可能有效。非随机研究表明皮质类固醇有益。两种常用的皮质类固醇是泼尼松和泼尼松龙。两者通常都以口服片剂形式给药。泼尼松在肝脏中转化为泼尼松龙,因此两种药物的效果通常相同。另一种皮质类固醇地塞米松效力更强,使用剂量较小。
评估与安慰剂或不治疗相比,皮质类固醇治疗CIDP的疗效,并比较不同皮质类固醇治疗方案的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组专业注册库(2012年2月20日)、CENTRAL(2012年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2012年2月)和EMBASE(1980年1月至2012年2月),以查找皮质类固醇治疗CIDP的随机试验。
我们纳入了采用任何形式的皮质类固醇或促肾上腺皮质激素治疗CIDP的随机或半随机试验,CIDP由国际公认的定义诊断。
两位作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。主要结局旨在评估残疾变化,次要结局包括12周后损伤变化、最大运动神经传导速度或复合肌肉动作电位幅度,以及不良事件。
在一项有35名符合条件参与者的非盲随机对照试验(RCT)中,本综述的主要结局数据不可用。19名接受泼尼松治疗的参与者中有12名在12周后神经病变损伤评分有所改善,而随机分配至不治疗组的16名参与者中有5名改善;改善的风险比(RR)为2.02(95%置信区间(CI)0.90至4.52)。未详细报告不良事件,但有一名接受泼尼松治疗的参与者死亡。在一项40名参与者的双盲RCT中,比较每日标准剂量口服泼尼松龙与每月高剂量口服地塞米松,本综述的任何结局数据均不可用。一年后缓解情况(RR 1.11;95%CI 0.50至2.45,倾向于每月使用地塞米松)或残疾或损伤变化方面无显著差异。泼尼松龙组16名参与者中有8名病情恶化,地塞米松组24名参与者中有7名病情恶化。每种治疗方案的不良事件相似,但每月使用地塞米松时失眠和满月脸(面部呈满月形外观)明显较少见。大型非随机研究的经验表明皮质类固醇有益,但长期使用会导致严重副作用。
一项小型随机试验的极低质量证据未显示口服泼尼松与不治疗相比有统计学显著益处。然而,皮质类固醇在实际中仍被广泛使用。根据一项RCT的中等质量证据,每月高剂量口服地塞米松的疗效与每日标准剂量口服泼尼松龙在统计学上无差异。两组中大多数不良事件的发生频率相似,但每月使用地塞米松时失眠和满月脸明显较少见。需要进一步研究以确定预测反应的因素。