Musini Vijaya M, Rezapour Pouria, Wright James M, Bassett Ken, Jauca Ciprian D
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, , Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD003825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub3.
Antihypertensive drugs from the thiazide diuretic drug class have been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Loop diuretics are indicated and used as antihypertensive drugs but a systematic review of their blood pressure lowering efficacy or effectiveness in terms of reducing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity from randomized controlled trial evidence has not been conducted.
To determine the dose related decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure as well as adverse events leading to patient withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects (serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids profile) due to loop diuretics versus placebo control in the treatment of patients with primary hypertension.
Medline (1946-February 2012), EMBASE (1974-February 2012), CENTRAL (issue 2, 2012) and bibliographic citations were searched.
Double blind randomized placebo controlled trials of at least 3 weeks duration comparing loop diuretic with a placebo in patients with primary hypertension defined as BP >140/90 mmHg at baseline were included.
Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Weighted mean difference and a fixed effects model were used to combine continuous outcome data. The drop outs due to adverse effects was analysed using relative risk ratio.
Nine trials evaluated the dose-related blood pressure lowering efficacy of five drugs within the loop diuretics class (furosemide 40 to 60mg, cicletanine 100 to 150 mg, piretanide 3 to 6 mg, indacrinone enantiomer -2.5 to -10.0/+80 mg and etozolin 200 mg) in 460 patients with baseline blood pressure of 162/103 mmHg for a mean duration of 8.8 weeks. The best estimate of systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics was -7.9 (-10.5, -5.4) mmHg/ -4.4 (-5.6, -2.8) mmHg . Withdrawals due to adverse effects and serum biochemical changes did not show a significant difference.The 2012 updated search resulted in no additional new trials meeting the minimum inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited number of published RCTs, the systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering effect of loop diuretics is modest (-8/-4 mmHg) and is likely an overestimate due to the high risk of bias in the included studies. There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different drugs within the loop diuretic class. The dose ranging effects of loop diuretics could not be evaluated. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with loop diuretics because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.
噻嗪类利尿药已被证明可降低死亡率和心血管疾病发病率。袢利尿剂被用作降压药,但尚未根据随机对照试验证据对其降低血压的疗效或在降低心血管死亡率或发病率方面的有效性进行系统评价。
确定与安慰剂对照相比,袢利尿剂治疗原发性高血压患者时,其导致收缩压和/或舒张压剂量相关下降以及导致患者退出的不良事件和不良生化效应(血清钾、尿酸、肌酐、血糖和血脂谱)。
检索了医学期刊数据库(1946年至2012年2月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1974年至2012年2月)、考克兰系统评价数据库(2012年第2期)及参考文献。
纳入至少为期3周的双盲随机安慰剂对照试验,试验对象为原发性高血压患者(基线血压>140/90 mmHg),将袢利尿剂与安慰剂进行比较。
两位作者独立评估偏倚风险并提取数据。采用加权均数差和固定效应模型合并连续结局数据。使用相对危险比分析因不良反应导致的退出情况。
9项试验评估了袢利尿剂类中5种药物(呋塞米40至60mg、环戊噻嗪100至150mg、吡咯他尼3至6mg、茚达立酮对映体-2.5至-10.0/+80mg和依他唑啉200mg)对460例基线血压为162/103 mmHg的患者的剂量相关降压疗效,平均疗程为8.8周。袢利尿剂降低收缩压/舒张压疗效的最佳估计值为-7.9(-10.5,-5.4)mmHg / -4.4(-5.6,-2.8)mmHg。因不良反应导致的退出情况和血清生化变化未显示出显著差异。2012年更新检索未得到符合最低纳入标准的新试验。
基于已发表的随机对照试验数量有限,袢利尿剂降低收缩压/舒张压的效果中等(-8 / -4 mmHg),且由于纳入研究存在高偏倚风险,这一效果可能被高估。袢利尿剂类中不同药物在临床上降低血压方面无显著差异。无法评估袢利尿剂不同剂量范围的效果。由于试验持续时间短且许多试验未报告不良反应,本综述未能很好地估计与袢利尿剂相关的危害发生率。