Suppr超能文献

知觉负荷对儿童言语语义通达的影响。

Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children.

机构信息

University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):388-403. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0186). Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine whether semantic access by speech requires attention in children.

METHOD

Children (N = 200) named pictures and ignored distractors on a cross-modal (distractors: auditory-no face) or multimodal (distractors: auditory-static face and audiovisual-dynamic face) picture word task. The cross-modal task had a low load, and the multimodal task had a high load (i.e., respectively naming pictures displayed on a blank screen vs. below the talker's face on his T-shirt). Semantic content of distractors was manipulated to be related vs. unrelated to the picture (e.g., picture "dog" with distractors "bear" vs. "cheese"). If irrelevant semantic content manipulation influences naming times on both tasks despite variations in loads, Lavie's (2005) perceptual load model proposes that semantic access is independent of capacity-limited attentional resources; if, however, irrelevant content influences naming only on the cross-modal task (low load), the perceptual load model proposes that semantic access is dependent on attentional resources exhausted by the higher load task.

RESULTS

Irrelevant semantic content affected performance for both tasks in 6- to 9-year-olds but only on the cross-modal task in 4- to 5-year-olds. The addition of visual speech did not influence results on the multimodal task.

CONCLUSION

Younger and older children differ in dependence on attentional resources for semantic access by speech.

摘要

目的

检验言语的语义通达是否需要儿童集中注意力。

方法

通过跨模态(干扰项:听觉无面部)或多模态(干扰项:听觉静态面部和视听动态面部)图片词任务,让 200 名儿童对图片进行命名并忽略干扰项。跨模态任务的负载较低,而多模态任务的负载较高(即分别在空白屏幕上显示图片与在说话者 T 恤上的面部下方显示图片进行命名)。干扰项的语义内容被操纵为与图片相关或不相关(例如,图片“狗”的干扰项为“熊”或“奶酪”)。如果无关的语义内容干扰在两种任务中都影响命名时间,尽管负载存在差异,那么 Lavie(2005)的知觉负载模型就提出语义通达是独立于容量有限的注意力资源的;然而,如果无关内容仅影响到跨模态任务(低负载),那么知觉负载模型就提出语义通达依赖于高负载任务所消耗的注意力资源。

结果

6 至 9 岁儿童在两种任务中都受到无关语义内容的影响,但在 4 至 5 岁儿童中仅在跨模态任务中受到影响。添加视觉语音并没有影响多模态任务的结果。

结论

年幼和年长的儿童在言语语义通达时对注意力资源的依赖程度不同。

相似文献

1
Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):388-403. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0186). Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):753-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318294e3f5.
3
Effects of onset- and rhyme-related distractors on phonological processing in children with specific language impairment.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Oct;51(5):1263-81. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0079). Epub 2008 Aug 26.
4
Developmental shifts in children's sensitivity to visual speech: a new multimodal picture-word task.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jan;102(1):40-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):650-5. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821a4578.
6
Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.031. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Whether attentional loads influence audiovisual integration depends on semantic associations.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2205-2218. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02461-y. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Age-related effects in compound production: Evidence from a double-object picture naming task.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1667-1681. doi: 10.1177/1747021818806491. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.
Am J Psychol. 1993 Fall;106(3):383-405.

引用本文的文献

2
Using Rasch Analysis to Examine the Item-Level Psychometrics of the .
Speech Lang Hear. 2017;20(3):130-143. doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1243747. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Children use visual speech to compensate for non-intact auditory speech.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Oct;126:295-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):753-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318294e3f5.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication.
Mem Cognit. 1974 Jul;2(4):641-6. doi: 10.3758/BF03198133.
2
Lexical access in children with and without specific language impairment: a cross-modal picture-word interference study.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Sep-Oct;43(5):528-51. doi: 10.1080/13682820701768581.
3
Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1780-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0144-4.
4
Theories of early language acquisition.
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Jul;1(4):146-53. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01039-5.
5
Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020733.
6
Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
7
Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(7):474-86. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.7.6.
8
Visual working memory is disrupted by covert verbal retrieval.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):516-21. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.516.
9
Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.
Brain Cogn. 2010 Nov;74(2):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验