Grassi Massimo, Bonato Mario
Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, via Venezia 8, I 35131 Padua, Italy.
Perception. 2012;41(4):498-500. doi: 10.1068/p7078.
Abstract. We discuss the results of Vicario (2011, Perception 40 23-29), in the light of an experiment designed to bypass some of the limits of that study. There, participants were asked to perform a temporal bisection on numerical stimuli (small or large digits) presented either for 700/900 ms or 2000/2200 ms. For the two longest durations only, bisections of larger digits occurred later than those of smaller digits. Here, subjects judged the temporal position of a flick occurring during the visual presentation of a digit (1, 5, or 9) which lasted on the screen for either 700 ms or 2000 ms. Results revealed no difference in the perceived temporal midpoints of large compared to small digits. In contrast, they showed a response bias: only with the shortest-duration stimuli the digit's magnitude affected the subject's response.
摘要。我们根据一项旨在绕过该研究某些局限性而设计的实验,讨论了维卡里奥(2011年,《感知》第40卷,第23 - 29页)的研究结果。在该研究中,参与者被要求对呈现时长为700/900毫秒或2000/2200毫秒的数字刺激(小数字或大数字)进行时间二等分。仅在两个最长时长的情况下,较大数字的二等分出现时间晚于较小数字的二等分。在此实验中,受试者判断在屏幕上持续700毫秒或2000毫秒的数字(1、5或9)视觉呈现过程中出现的一次闪烁的时间位置。结果显示,与小数字相比,大数字的感知时间中点并无差异。相反,结果显示出一种反应偏差:仅在最短时长的刺激下,数字大小会影响受试者的反应。