• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Non-target language processing in Chinese-English bilinguals: a study of event-related potential.

作者信息

Li Li, Fan Meng, Sun Bing, Wang Ruiming, Mo Lei, Zhang John Xuexin

机构信息

South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):935-45. doi: 10.2466/10.11.17.21.PR0.110.3.935-945.

DOI:10.2466/10.11.17.21.PR0.110.3.935-945
PMID:22897095
Abstract

The event-related brain potential (ERP) technique was used to investigate the neural mechanism of non-target language processing in Chinese-English bilinguals. Participants were presented with a mixed list of Chinese and English words and required to make conceptual decisions for words in one language and ignore words in the other non-target language. Regardless of whether the nontarget word was in Chinese or English, the ERPs they elicited were modulated by word frequency, suggesting that their meaning had been accessed. The N400 peak was delayed in the English as the non-target language condition, probably because participants were less proficient in English. The results suggest that the non-target language can be processed during conceptual tasks with participants' proficiency in this language being a critical factor.

摘要

相似文献

1
Non-target language processing in Chinese-English bilinguals: a study of event-related potential.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):935-45. doi: 10.2466/10.11.17.21.PR0.110.3.935-945.
2
Electrophysiological evidence for language interference in late bilinguals.晚期双语者语言干扰的电生理证据。
Neuroreport. 2004 Jul 19;15(10):1555-8. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000134214.57469.c2.
3
ERP measures of auditory word repetition and translation priming in bilinguals.双语者听觉单词重复与翻译启动的事件相关电位测量
Brain Res. 2006 Dec 13;1125(1):116-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
4
Language representation and processing in fluent bilinguals: electrophysiological evidence for asymmetric mapping in bilingual memory.双语流畅者的语言表现与处理:双语记忆中不对称映射的电生理证据
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1426-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
5
Head start for target language in bilingual listening.双语聆听中目标语的先行优势。
Brain Res. 2014 Jan 13;1542:111-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.汉语单音节词语音识别的时间进程:来自 ERP 分析的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
7
Neural mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese and English words in a word generation task: an event-related potential study.词语生成任务中汉语和英语单词加工的神经机制:一项事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2008 Nov;45(6):970-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00703.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
8
Language switching mechanisms in simultaneous interpreters: an ERP study.同声传译员的语言切换机制:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1636-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.013.
9
Differences in word recognition between early bilinguals and monolinguals: behavioral and ERP evidence.早期双语者和单语者在单词识别方面的差异:行为和 ERP 证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
10
Are phonological representations in bilinguals language specific? An ERP study on interlingual homophones.双语者的语音表征是否具有语言特异性?关于同音异义词的事件相关电位研究。
Psychophysiology. 2012 Apr;49(4):531-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01333.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Attention on the Syllable-Induced Prepulse Inhibition of the Startle Reflex and Cortical EEG Responses against Energetic or Informational Masking in Humans.注意力对音节诱发的惊吓反射预脉冲抑制及人类针对能量或信息掩蔽的皮质脑电图反应的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 May 18;12(5):660. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050660.