Capanna Cristina, Struglia Francesca, Riccardi Ilaria, Daneluzzo Enrico, Stratta Paolo, Rossi Alessandro
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):1002-6. doi: 10.2466/02.03.09.PR0.110.3.1002-1006.
This study evaluated the correspondence between measures of two competing theories of personality, the five-factor model as measured by the Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ), and Cloninger's psychobiological theory measured by the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R). A sample of 900 Italian participants, balanced with respect to sex (393 men and 507 women), and representative of the adult population with respect to age (range 18 to 70 years; M = 39.6, SD = 15.7) completed the TCI-R and the Big Five Questionnaire. All TCI-R personality dimensions except Self-Transcendence were moderately correlated with one or more of the Big Five dimensions (from r = .40 to .61), and the two instruments showed areas of convergence. However, the differences outweighed the similarities, indicating that these current conceptualizations and measures of personality are somewhat inconsistent with each other.
本研究评估了两种相互竞争的人格理论测量方法之间的对应关系,一种是通过大五问卷(BFQ)测量的五因素模型,另一种是通过修订版气质与性格量表(TCI-R)测量的克隆宁格心理生物学理论。900名意大利参与者组成的样本在性别上保持平衡(393名男性和507名女性),在年龄上代表了成年人群体(年龄范围18至70岁;M = 39.6,SD = 15.7),他们完成了TCI-R和大五问卷。除自我超越外,所有TCI-R人格维度与一个或多个大五维度均呈中等程度相关(r值从0.40至0.61),并且这两种工具显示出趋同的领域。然而,差异超过了相似性,表明目前这些人格的概念化和测量方法彼此之间存在一定程度的不一致。