Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2012 Nov;26(6):452-8. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.715605. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
This paper is the first of a two-part series. It presents a research study that aimed to provide a more contextual description of the commonly applied definition of interprofessional education (IPE) offered in 2002 by the Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE) in the UK: "when two or more professions learn with, from and about each other to improve collaboration and quality of care." The study confirmed and consolidated key characteristics of IPE by exploring the meaning of with, from and about. The words with, from and about were regarded as complex. Words describing learning with each other included active engagement, co-location and equally valued. Concepts linked to learning about included knowing about people outside their professional role and interaction. Learning from others was characterized by trust, respect and confidence in others' knowledge. Although learning about others was described as the first part of learning with, from and about, there were mixed views on whether learning with or from formed the second part of the definition. Based on this work, the second paper in this series presents a proposed taxonomy for IPE that may serve to inform emerging applications for IPE in the context of education, service delivery and policy. This research contributes to an emerging understanding of IPE that will support competency development and sound curriculum design, continuing professional development and evaluation of the impact of IPE and collaboration on health outcomes.
这篇论文是两部分系列中的第一部分。它介绍了一项研究,旨在更详细地描述英国促进跨专业教育中心(CAIPE)在 2002 年提出的跨专业教育(IPE)的常用定义:“当两个或两个以上的专业相互学习、相互学习、相互了解,以改善合作和护理质量。”该研究通过探索“与”“从”和“关于”的含义,证实并巩固了 IPE 的关键特征。“与”“从”和“关于”这三个词被认为是复杂的。描述相互学习的词包括积极参与、共同定位和同等重视。关于了解他人的概念包括了解其专业角色之外的人的情况和互动。向他人学习的特点是信任、尊重和对他人知识的信心。虽然学习关于他人被描述为与他人一起学习、从他人那里学习的第一部分,但对于从他人那里学习或从他人那里学习是否构成该定义的第二部分,存在不同看法。基于这项工作,本系列的第二篇论文提出了一个 IPE 的分类法,这可能有助于为 IPE 在教育、服务提供和政策方面的新应用提供信息。这项研究有助于人们对 IPE 的理解不断加深,从而支持能力发展和完善课程设计、继续教育以及评估 IPE 和合作对健康结果的影响。