• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策沟通障碍分析:医生和患者观点之间的差距

Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.

机构信息

Health Psychology Department, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain; Sexual and Reproductive Health, Centro Salud Hospital-Pla, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):826-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00809.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00809.x
PMID:22897499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are doubts on whether patients feel that they have sufficient information for actively participating in clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the type of information that patients receive. To determine whether patients consider this information sufficient, and whether it contributes or not to improve clinical safety. To identify the barriers for patient participation in clinical decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with 764 patients and 327 physicians.

STUDY SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen health centres belonging to three primary care districts and three hospitals in Spain.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Just 35.1% (268) (95% CI 32.2, 39.1%) of patients preferred to have the last word in clinical decisions. Age (39 vs. 62%, P < 0.001) and severity of illness (38 vs. 46%, P = 0.002) increased the tendency to take a passive role. In 85.1% (650) (95% CI 83.3, 88.3%) of the cases, patients reported having received sufficient information. Lack of consultation time (29.6%, 95% CI 25.8, 32.5%) and patients' use of Internet or other sources (19.2%, 95% CI 16.4, 22.2%) were identified as new obstacles to doctor-patient communication by the patients. Only 19.6% (64) (95% CI 15.4, 24.2%) of doctors considered that they could intervene to involve patients in the decisions.

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients prefer the decisions to be made by their doctor, especially those with more severe illnesses, and older patients. Patients are not normally informed about medication interactions, precautions and foreseeable complications. The information provided by general practitioners does not seem to contribute enough to the patient involvement in clinical safety.

摘要

背景

人们对患者是否认为自己获得了足够的信息以积极参与临床决策存在疑虑。

目的

描述患者所获得的信息类型。确定患者是否认为这些信息足够,并确定其是否有助于提高临床安全性。识别患者参与临床决策制定的障碍。

研究设计

一项包含 764 名患者和 327 名医生的横断面研究。

研究地点和参与者

西班牙三个初级保健区的 14 个卫生中心和 3 家医院。

主要发现

只有 35.1%(268 人)(95%CI 32.2%,39.1%)的患者希望在临床决策中拥有最终决定权。年龄(39 岁比 62%,P<0.001)和疾病严重程度(38 岁比 46%,P=0.002)增加了被动参与的倾向。在 85.1%(650 人)(95%CI 83.3%,88.3%)的情况下,患者报告说他们获得了足够的信息。缺乏咨询时间(29.6%,95%CI 25.8%,32.5%)和患者使用互联网或其他来源(19.2%,95%CI 16.4%,22.2%)被患者视为医患沟通的新障碍。只有 19.6%(64 人)(95%CI 15.4%,24.2%)的医生认为他们可以干预以促使患者参与决策。

讨论和结论

大多数患者更喜欢由医生做出决定,尤其是那些病情较重和老年患者。患者通常不会被告知药物相互作用、预防措施和可预见的并发症。全科医生提供的信息似乎不足以促进患者参与临床安全。

相似文献

1
Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.临床决策沟通障碍分析:医生和患者观点之间的差距
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):826-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00809.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
2
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
3
Patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic.患者参与决策:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e010063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063.
4
Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions-Preliminary testing of a newly developed module.对医生进行简短的现场培训,让他们参与患者的医疗决策——新开发模块的初步测试。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1254-1263. doi: 10.1111/hex.12565. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Understanding patients' and doctors' attitudes about shared decision making for advance care planning.了解患者和医生对于预先医疗计划共同决策的态度。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2054-65. doi: 10.1111/hex.12285. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.界定新加坡接受麻醉患者共同决策的合理患者标准及偏好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2.
7
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
8
Patient experience and satisfaction with shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study among outpatients.患者对共同决策的体验和满意度:一项门诊患者的横断面研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Dec;129:108410. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108410. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
9
Predictors of hospitalised patients' preferences for physician-directed medical decision-making.预测住院患者对医生主导的医疗决策偏好的因素。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):77-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040618. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?患者在决策过程中的参与度是否随时间发生了变化?
Health Expect. 2006 Dec;9(4):333-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00413.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation suggestions for shared decision-making: results from a comparative study of inpatients and outpatients experience surveys.共享决策的实施建议:住院患者与门诊患者体验调查比较研究的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12507-0.
2
An Exploration of the Content and Language Used in Publicly Available National Health Service Patient Information Leaflets for People Considering Shoulder Replacement Surgery: A Qualitative Study.一项针对考虑进行肩部置换手术的人群的英国国家医疗服务体系公开患者信息手册的内容与语言使用情况的探索性定性研究。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Mar;23(1):e70079. doi: 10.1002/msc.70079.
3
Laypeople's Perspective on Physician Work-Hour Restrictions in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本民众对医生工作时间限制的看法:一项横断面研究
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 12;11:23743735241305337. doi: 10.1177/23743735241305337. eCollection 2024.
4
Differences in Perception of Healthcare Management between Patients and Professionals.患者与专业人士对医疗管理的认知差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053842.
5
Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.患者辅导:患者想要什么?在门诊候诊室进行的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.
6
Patients' Views on the Design of DiabeText, a New mHealth Intervention to Improve Adherence to Oral Antidiabetes Medication in Spain: A Qualitative Study.患者对 DiabeText 的设计看法,这是一种新的移动医疗干预措施,旨在提高西班牙患者口服抗糖尿病药物的依从性:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;19(3):1902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031902.
7
The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician-Patient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives.从医生和患者的角度看医生的沟通和同理心能力对医患关系的影响。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Dec;29(4):849-860. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient-reported patient safety in Primary Care].[新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行对基层医疗中患者报告的患者安全的影响]
Aten Primaria. 2021 Dec;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102222. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102222.
9
Patients as team members: Factors affecting involvement in treatment decisions from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition.患者作为团队成员:从慢性病患者的角度出发影响其参与治疗决策的因素。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):138-148. doi: 10.1111/hex.13358. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
10
Proposals for person-centred care in the COVID-19 era. Delphi study.《COVID-19 时代的以患者为中心的护理建议》。德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):687-699. doi: 10.1111/hex.13218. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety.患者参与:当前的知识和在患者安全中的适用性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jan;85(1):53-62. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
2
Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale.家庭决策自我效能量表的编制与验证
Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep;7(3):315-21. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990241.
3
[Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-15 for use in the Spanish population].[用于西班牙人群的Picker患者体验问卷-15的跨文化调适与验证]
Rev Calid Asist. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
4
Review: engaging patients as vigilant partners in safety: a systematic review.综述:让患者作为警惕的安全伙伴参与其中:一项系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Apr;67(2):119-48. doi: 10.1177/1077558709342254. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
5
Keeping the patient in the equation--humanism and health care reform.将患者纳入考量——人文主义与医疗改革。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):554-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904813.
6
[Perceptions of clinical safety after hospital discharge].[出院后对临床安全性的认知]
Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Dec;131 Suppl 3:26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(08)76458-3.
7
Understanding respect: learning from patients.理解尊重:向患者学习。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul;35(7):419-23. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027235.
8
Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study.在哪些情况下患者希望了解其并发症风险?一项病例 vignette 研究。
J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):276-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025031.
9
Predictors of patient satisfaction in surgery.手术患者满意度的预测因素。
Surgery. 2009 May;145(5):536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.01.012.
10
[Listen carefully to the patient, it means more advantages than costs].
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Oct 2;135(10):477-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Apr 16.