• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者辅导:患者想要什么?在门诊候诊室进行的混合方法研究。

Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Program Older Adults and Health, Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269677
PMID:35679303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9182226/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective communication in specialist consultations is difficult for some patients. These patients could benefit from support from a coach who accompanies them to and during medical specialist consultations to improve communication in the consultation room. This study aims to investigate patients' perspective on interest in support from a patient coach, what kind of support they would like to receive and what characterizes an ideal patient coach.

METHODS

We applied a mixed method design to obtain a realistic understanding of patients' perspectives on a patient coach. Patients in the waiting rooms of outpatient clinics were asked to fill out a short questionnaire which included questions about demographic characteristics, perceived efficacy in patient-provider interaction and patients' interest in support from a patient coach. Subsequently, patients interested in a patient coach were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. The quantitative data were examined using univariate analysis and the qualitative interview data were analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 154 patients and eight of them were interviewed. Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions was the only variable that showed a significant difference between patients with and without an interest in support from a patient coach. The interviews revealed that a bad communication experience was the main reason for having an interest in support from a patient coach. Before the consultation, a patient coach should take the time to get to know the patient, build trust, and help the patient create an agenda, so take the patient seriously and recognize the patient as a whole person. During the consultation, a patient coach should support the patient by intervening and mediating when necessary to elicit the patient's agenda. After the consultation, a patient coach should be able to explain and discuss medical information and treatment consequences. An ideal patient coach should have medical knowledge, a strong personality and good communication skills.

CONCLUSION

Especially patients who had a bad communication experience in a specialist consultation would like support from a patient coach. The kind of support they valued most was intervening and mediating during the consultation. To build the necessary trust, patient coaches should take time to get to know the patient and take the patient seriously. Medical knowledge, good communication skills and a strong personality were considered prerequisites for patient coaches to be capable to intervene in specialist consultations.

摘要

介绍

对于一些患者来说,在专科医生就诊时进行有效的沟通是困难的。这些患者可以从陪同他们去看专科医生和在就诊期间提供支持的教练那里受益,以改善诊室中的沟通。本研究旨在调查患者对教练支持的兴趣,他们希望得到什么样的支持,以及理想的教练有哪些特点。

方法

我们采用混合方法设计,以真实了解患者对教练的看法。在门诊候诊室的患者被要求填写一份简短的问卷,其中包括关于人口统计学特征、对医患互动的感知效力以及对教练支持的兴趣等问题。随后,对有兴趣接受教练支持的患者进行半结构化访谈。使用单变量分析对定量数据进行检验,对定性访谈数据进行内容分析。

结果

共有 154 名患者完成了调查,其中 8 名患者接受了访谈。在医患互动中的感知效力是对教练支持感兴趣和不感兴趣的患者之间唯一有显著差异的变量。访谈显示,不良的沟通体验是对教练支持感兴趣的主要原因。在就诊前,教练应该花时间了解患者、建立信任,并帮助患者制定议程,从而认真对待患者并将其视为完整的人。在就诊期间,教练应在必要时进行干预和调解,以引出患者的议程。就诊后,教练应能够解释和讨论医疗信息和治疗后果。理想的教练应该具备医学知识、坚强的个性和良好的沟通技巧。

结论

特别是在专科就诊时沟通体验不佳的患者,希望得到教练的支持。他们最看重的支持是在就诊期间进行干预和调解。为了建立必要的信任,教练应该花时间了解患者并认真对待患者。医学知识、良好的沟通技巧和坚强的个性被认为是教练能够干预专科就诊的前提条件。

相似文献

1
Patient coaching: What do patients want? A mixed methods study in waiting rooms of outpatient clinics.患者辅导:患者想要什么?在门诊候诊室进行的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269677. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient coaching in secondary care: healthcare professionals' views on target group, intervention and coach profile.二级保健中的患者辅导:医疗保健专业人员对目标人群、干预措施和辅导人员特征的看法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jul 17;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab094.
3
Patient coaching in specialist consultations. Which patients are interested in a coach and what communication barriers do they perceive?患者在专科咨询中的辅导。哪些患者对教练感兴趣,他们认为有哪些沟通障碍?
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Aug;102(8):1520-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Does patient coaching make a difference in patient-physician communication during specialist consultations? A systematic review.患者指导在专科会诊期间对医患沟通有影响吗?一项系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):882-896. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.029. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
A multi-centre study of interactional style in nurse specialist- and physician-led Rheumatology clinics in the UK.一项关于英国专科护士和医生主导的风湿病诊所互动风格的多中心研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
7
Exploring the Discursive Emphasis on Patients and Coaches Who Participated in Technology-Assisted Diabetes Self-management Education: Clinical Implementation Study of Health360x.探索参与技术辅助糖尿病自我管理教育的患者和教练的话语重点:Health360x 的临床实施研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 18;24(3):e23535. doi: 10.2196/23535.
8
Career coach preferences of medical students: coaching specialist or specialistic coach?医学生对职业教练的偏好:专项教练还是专家型教练?
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 21;23(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04882-1.
9
Client Perspectives on Health Coaching: Insight for Improved Program Design.客户对健康指导的看法:改进项目设计的启示。
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Sep 1;44(5):591-602. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.5.4.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Nurse Communication in an Oncology Hospital Setting: A Qualitative Study.肿瘤医院环境中的医患沟通:一项定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;13(1):50. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010050.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient coaching in secondary care: healthcare professionals' views on target group, intervention and coach profile.二级保健中的患者辅导:医疗保健专业人员对目标人群、干预措施和辅导人员特征的看法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jul 17;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab094.
2
Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: a Randomized Trial.预访情境数据收集对医患沟通和患者激活的影响:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3321-3329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06583-7. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.沟通如何“失败”或“扭转局面”:医疗差错的反事实叙述
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health.家庭医学与社区卫生中的混合方法和调查研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 28;7(2):e000086. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000086. eCollection 2019.
5
Building ground for didactics in a patient decision aid for hip osteoarthritis. Exploring patient-related barriers and facilitators towards shared decision-making.为髋关节骨关节炎患者决策辅助工具构建教学基础。探索与患者相关的障碍和促进因素,以实现共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jul;103(7):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Shifts in patients' question-asking behaviour between 2007 and 2016: An observational study of video-recorded general practice consultations.2007 年至 2016 年间患者提问行为的转变:对视频记录的一般实践咨询的观察性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1168-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Barriers and facilitators to GP-patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care: a systematic review.英国初级医疗中全科医生与患者就情感问题进行沟通的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 5;37(4):434-444. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa002.
8
Vulnerability identified in clinical practice: a qualitative analysis.临床实践中发现的脆弱性:定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0416-4.
9
Patients' and physicians' perspectives and experiences on the quality of medical consultations: a qualitative study.患者和医生对医疗咨询质量的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):247-255. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000210.
10
Patient coaching in specialist consultations. Which patients are interested in a coach and what communication barriers do they perceive?患者在专科咨询中的辅导。哪些患者对教练感兴趣,他们认为有哪些沟通障碍?
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Aug;102(8):1520-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 18.