• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦政府资助的绝育手术:是时候重新考虑政策了吗?

Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1822-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850
PMID:22897531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3490665/
Abstract

In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women from getting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decision-making and honor women's reproductive choices.

摘要

20 世纪 70 年代,美国对贫困和少数族裔妇女强制绝育的担忧促使美国卫生、教育和福利部为联邦资助的绝育程序制定了严格的规定。尽管这些政策的制定是为了确保知情同意和防止妇女非自愿绝育,但有大量数据表明,这些政策实际上并不能确保同意是真正知情的,而且可能会阻止许多低收入妇女进行她们想要的绝育手术。考虑到美国意外怀孕率高得惊人,尤其是在低收入人群中,我们认为,应该重新审查和修改限制联邦绝育政策,以同时确保做出明智的决策并尊重妇女的生殖选择。

相似文献

1
Federally funded sterilization: time to rethink policy?联邦政府资助的绝育手术:是时候重新考虑政策了吗?
Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1822-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300850. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
2
New regulations governing DHEW sterilization funding now in effect; stress informed consent.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1979 Jan-Feb;11(1):46-7.
3
Reproduction, ethics, and public policy: the federal sterilization regulations.生殖、伦理与公共政策:联邦绝育法规
Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Oct;9(5):29-41.
4
Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.因修正医疗补助绝育政策而避免的潜在非意愿妊娠和节省的成本。
Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.联邦政府资助的计划生育项目下的强制绝育
New Engl Law Rev. 1976 Spring;11(2):589-614.
6
Provision of sterilization in federally assisted programs of the Public Health Service.
Fed Regist. 1978 Nov 8;43(217):52146-75.
7
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.1982年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金投入
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.
8
Sterilization restrictions: federally funded programs and projects.
Fed Regist. 1974 Feb 6;39(26):4730-4.
9
Sterilization.
Forum (Wash). 1978;2(2):6-13.
10
Adding injury to injury: ethical implications of the Medicaid sterilization consent regulations.雪上加霜:医疗补助绝育同意规定的伦理影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1348-1351. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000265.

引用本文的文献

1
"One's life becomes even more miserable when we hear all those hurtful words". A mixed methods systematic review of disrespect and abuse in abortion care.当我们听到所有那些伤人的话语时,一个人的生活会变得更加悲惨。关于堕胎护理中不尊重和虐待行为的混合方法系统评价。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 May 15;7:1561707. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1561707. eCollection 2025.
2
Multi-level barriers to equitable postpartum permanent contraception.公平产后长效避孕的多层次障碍。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251325977. doi: 10.1177/17455057251325977. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Postpartum Patient Perspectives on the US Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.产后患者对美国医疗补助计划中永久避孕等待期的看法。
Open Access J Contracept. 2025 Feb 25;16:31-41. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S506703. eCollection 2025.
4
Obstetrician-Gynecologist Perspectives and Counseling Practices on the U.S. Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.妇产科医生对美国医疗补助计划中永久避孕等待期的看法及咨询实践
Womens Health Issues. 2025 Mar-Apr;35(2):83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
Development of , a web-based decision aid to support permanent contraception decision making.开发一款基于网络的决策辅助工具,以支持永久性避孕决策。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,这里是根据推测补充完整后翻译的,若原文有误请纠正。)
PEC Innov. 2023 Aug 29;3:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100203. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
6
Mi PROTECT: A personalized smartphone platform to report back results to participants of a maternal-child and environmental health research cohort program in Puerto Rico.我的保护计划:一个个性化的智能手机平台,用于向波多黎各母婴与环境卫生研究队列项目的参与者反馈结果。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jan 18;2(1):e0000172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000172. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Nonfulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception and resultant maternal and pregnancy health outcomes.期望的产后永久性避孕措施未落实及其对孕产妇和妊娠健康结局的影响。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Dec 24;3(1):100151. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100151. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Race, class, caste, disability, sterilisation and hysterectomy.种族、阶级、种姓、残疾、绝育和子宫切除术。
Med Humanit. 2023 Mar;49(1):27-37. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012381. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Variation by state in Medicaid sterilization policies for physician reimbursement.各州在医疗补助计划中对医生报酬的绝育政策存在差异。
Contraception. 2021 Apr;103(4):255-260. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
What constitutes a good healthcare experience for unintended pregnancy? A qualitative study among young people in California.意外怀孕的良好医疗体验包括哪些内容?加利福尼亚州年轻人的定性研究。
Cult Health Sex. 2022 Mar;24(3):330-343. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1840631. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
2
Use of a low-literacy informed consent form to improve women's understanding of tubal sterilization: a randomized controlled trial.使用低文化程度知情同意书提高妇女对输卵管绝育术的理解:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1160-1166. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318213cbb1.
3
Evaluation of the effect of a patient decision aid about vasectomy on the decision-making process: a randomized trial.评价一种关于男性结扎的患者决策辅助工具对决策过程的影响:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2010 Dec;82(6):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.未满足产后绝育要求的女性的一年随访。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1071-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73eaa.
5
Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: role of patient-level factors.输卵管绝育率的种族差异:患者因素的作用。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.031. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
6
A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.手术知情同意的回顾:过去、现在和未来。帮助患者做出更好决策的探索。
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1406-15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0.
7
The quality of operative consenting against RCOG advice as standard.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Feb;30(2):159-65. doi: 10.3109/01443610903470254.
8
Unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.产后绝育请求未得到满足。
J Reprod Med. 2009 Aug;54(8):467-72.
9
"Everything I know I learned from my mother...Or not": perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.“我所知道的一切都是从母亲那里学到的……或者并非如此”:非裔美国女性和白人女性对输卵管绝育决策的看法
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):312-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0887-3. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
10
Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures.侵入性操作知情同意的质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):352-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn025. Epub 2008 Jul 14.