Durand L G, Blanchard M, Cloutier G, Sabbah H N, Stein P D
Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, P.Q., Canada.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Dec;37(12):1121-9. doi: 10.1109/10.64456.
The diagnostic performance of two pattern recognition methods (or classifiers) to detect valvular degeneration was evaluated in 48 patients with a porcine bioprosthetic heart valve inserted in the mitral position. Twenty patients had a normal porcine bioprosthetic valve and 28 patients had a degenerated bioprosthetic valve. One method was based on the Gaussian-Bayes model and the second on the "nearest neighbor" algorithm using three distance measurements. Eighteen diagnostic features were extracted from the sound spectrum of each patient and, for each method, a two-class supervised learning approach was used to determine the most discriminant diagnostic patterns composed of 6 features or less. The probability of error of the classifiers was estimated with the leave-one-out approach. The performance of each method to discriminate between normal and degenerated bioprosthetic valves was verified by clinical evaluation of the valves. The best performance in evaluation of the sound spectrum (98% correct classifications) was obtained with the Bayes classifier and two patterns of six features each. The percentage of false positive classifications of valve degeneration was 0% and the percentage of false negative classifications was 4%. Sensitivity for the detection of valve degeneration was 96%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 95%. The best performance of the nearest neighbor method (94% correct classifications) was obtained by using the Mahalanobis distance and five patterns composed of three, four, five, or six diagnostic features. Using a pattern composed of only three features, the percentage of false positive classifications for degeneration was 10% and the percentage of false negative classifications was 4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在48例二尖瓣位置植入猪生物瓣膜的患者中,评估了两种模式识别方法(或分类器)检测瓣膜退变的诊断性能。20例患者的猪生物瓣膜正常,28例患者的生物瓣膜发生了退变。一种方法基于高斯 - 贝叶斯模型,另一种基于使用三种距离测量的“最近邻”算法。从每位患者的声谱中提取了18个诊断特征,并且对于每种方法,使用两类监督学习方法来确定由6个或更少特征组成的最具判别力的诊断模式。采用留一法估计分类器的错误概率。通过对瓣膜的临床评估验证了每种方法区分正常和退变生物瓣膜的性能。贝叶斯分类器以及两种各由六个特征组成的模式在声谱评估中表现最佳(正确分类率为98%)。瓣膜退变的假阳性分类百分比为0%,假阴性分类百分比为4%。检测瓣膜退变的敏感性为96%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为95%。最近邻法的最佳性能(正确分类率为94%)是通过使用马氏距离以及由三个、四个、五个或六个诊断特征组成的五种模式获得的。使用仅由三个特征组成的模式时,退变的假阳性分类百分比为10%,假阴性分类百分比为4%。(摘要截断于250字)