Suppr超能文献

静脉注射白消安和马法兰作为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞移植的预处理方案:与仅用马法兰方案的匹配比较。

Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach.

机构信息

Hematology Service, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

Abstract

Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (MEL200) is the standard conditioning regimen administered to newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Few alternatives have been explored in order to improve the antimyeloma activity of this conditioning. We compare i.v. busulfan (BU) 9.6 mg/kg and MEL 140 mg/m(2) (MEL140) versus MEL200 mg/m(2) as a conditioning regimen before ASCT for newly diagnosed patients with MM. For this purpose, 51 patients receiving i.v. BU plus MEL were compared to 102 patients receiving MEL200 mg/m(2) in a 1:2 matched control analysis. Matching criteria included age, clinical stage at diagnosis, and response to induction therapy. No differences in the overall and complete response (CR) rates were observed after ASCT between both groups. After a median follow-up of 63 and 50 months in control and BU plus MEL groups, progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 and 33 months, respectively (P = .10). Most frequent toxicities included mucositis and febrile neutropenia in both groups. No case of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was observed. Transplant-related mortality was 4% and 2% in BU plus MEL and control groups, respectively. ASCT conditioned with i.v. BU plus MEL may be considered an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a MEL-only approach as a conditioning regimen for patients with MM who are candidates for ASCT.

摘要

美法仑 200mg/m²(MEL200)是新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者接受自体干细胞移植(ASCT)时的标准预处理方案。为了提高这种预处理的抗骨髓瘤活性,人们已经探索了很少的替代方案。我们比较了静脉注射白消安(BU)9.6mg/kg 和 MEL140mg/m²(MEL140)与 MEL200mg/m²作为新诊断 MM 患者 ASCT 前的预处理方案。为此,我们比较了接受静脉注射 BU 加 MEL 的 51 例患者与接受 MEL200mg/m²的 102 例患者。匹配标准包括年龄、诊断时的临床分期和诱导治疗的反应。两组患者 ASCT 后的总体反应率和完全缓解率(CR)没有差异。在对照组和 BU 加 MEL 组的中位随访时间分别为 63 个月和 50 个月后,无进展生存(PFS)分别为 24 个月和 33 个月(P=0.10)。两组最常见的毒性包括黏膜炎和发热性中性粒细胞减少症。未观察到窦状隙阻塞综合征。BU 加 MEL 组和对照组的移植相关死亡率分别为 4%和 2%。对于适合 ASCT 的 MM 患者,与仅用 MEL 预处理相比,ASCT 用静脉注射 BU 加 MEL 预处理可作为一种有效且耐受性良好的替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验