• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)与开放手术治疗胸主动脉瘤的长期比较。

Long-term comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to open surgery for the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 6th Floor Silverstein Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19096, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):604-9; discussion 609-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.049.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.049
PMID:22898503
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become a widely established treatment for a variety of thoracic aortic pathologic diseases despite limited long-term data to support its use. We compared the long-term outcomes of TEVAR with the 3 commercially available stents grafts for thoracic aortic aneurysms to results in control subjects undergoing open surgery.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical radiographic parameters were collected prospectively on patients enrolled in trials assessing the Gore TAG (55), Medtronic Talent (36) and Cook TX2 (15) devices. Outcomes were compared with 45 contemporaneous open controls. Detailed clinical and radiographic information was available for analysis. Standard univariate, survival, and regression methods were used.

RESULTS

During the study period (1995-2007) 106 patients were enrolled in TEVAR trials and there were 45 open controls. TEVAR patients were older and had significantly more comorbidities including diabetes and renal failure. TEVAR patients had 2.3 ± 1.3 devices implanted. Mortality (2.6% TEVAR, 6.7% open; P = .1), paralysis/paraparesis (3.9% TEVAR, 7.1% open; P = .2), and prolonged intubation more than 24 hours (9% TEVAR, 24% open; P = .02) tended to be more common in the open controls. Overall survival at 10 years was similar between groups (log rank P = .5). Multivariate predictors of late mortality included age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and chronic renal failure. Use of TEVAR versus open surgery did not influence mortality (hazard ratio, 0.9 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.6). Over 5 years of radiographic follow-up in the TEVAR group, mean aortic diameter decreased from 61 to 55 mm. Freedom from reintervention on the treated segment was 85% in TEVAR patients at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR is a safe and effective procedure to treat thoracic aortic aneurysms with improved perioperative and similar long-term results as open thoracic aortic repair. TEVAR-treated aneurysm diameters initially decrease and then stabilize over time.

摘要

目的

尽管关于胸主动脉血管内修复术(TEVAR)的长期数据有限,但它已成为治疗多种胸主动脉病变的广泛应用的治疗方法。我们比较了 TEVAR 与 3 种市售的胸主动脉瘤支架移植物的长期结果,以及接受开放手术的对照组的结果。

方法

前瞻性收集参加评估 Gore TAG(55 例)、美敦力 Talent(36 例)和 Cook TX2(15 例)装置的临床试验的患者的人口统计学、临床影像学参数。将结果与 45 例同期的开放对照组进行比较。详细的临床和影像学信息可供分析。采用标准的单变量、生存和回归方法。

结果

在研究期间(1995-2007 年),共有 106 例患者参加了 TEVAR 试验,并有 45 例开放对照组。TEVAR 患者年龄较大,合并症更多,包括糖尿病和肾功能衰竭。TEVAR 患者植入了 2.3±1.3 个器械。死亡率(TEVAR 组 2.6%,开放组 6.7%;P=0.1)、瘫痪/截瘫(TEVAR 组 3.9%,开放组 7.1%;P=0.2)和延长插管超过 24 小时(TEVAR 组 9%,开放组 24%;P=0.02)在开放对照组中更为常见。两组 10 年总体生存率相似(对数秩检验 P=0.5)。晚期死亡的多变量预测因素包括年龄、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、糖尿病和慢性肾功能衰竭。与开放手术相比,TEVAR 的使用并未影响死亡率(风险比,0.9;95%置信区间,0.4-1.6)。在 TEVAR 组的 5 年影像学随访中,主动脉直径从 61 毫米降至 55 毫米。TEVAR 患者 10 年时治疗节段的无再干预率为 85%。

结论

TEVAR 是一种安全有效的治疗胸主动脉瘤的方法,其围手术期效果改善,与开放胸主动脉修复的长期结果相似。TEVAR 治疗后的动脉瘤直径最初减小,然后随时间稳定。

相似文献

1
Long-term comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to open surgery for the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms.胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)与开放手术治疗胸主动脉瘤的长期比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):604-9; discussion 609-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.049.
2
Propensity-matched cohort validates findings of the VALOR trial.倾向评分匹配队列验证了 VALOR 试验的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.052. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
3
International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results.使用Zenith TX2血管内移植物进行胸主动脉瘤腔内修复的国际对照临床试验:1年结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):247-257; discussion 257. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.032.
4
Fenestrated and branched stent-grafting after previous open or endovascular aortic surgery.在先前进行开放性或血管腔内主动脉手术后进行开窗和分支支架植入术。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):95-103.
5
Cohort comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with open thoracic aortic repair using modern end-organ preservation strategies.采用现代终末器官保护策略对胸主动脉腔内修复术与开放性胸主动脉修复术进行队列比较。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
6
Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a nationwide risk-adjusted study of 923 patients.血管内与开放修复破裂性降主动脉夹层动脉瘤:923 例全国风险调整研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):1010-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
7
Open versus endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample study.胸主动脉瘤开放修复术与血管腔内修复术:一项全国住院患者样本研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;48(5-6):383-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574414540484. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
8
Anatomic severity grading score for primary descending thoracic aneurysms predicts procedural difficulty and aortic-related reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.原发性降主动脉瘤的解剖严重程度分级评分可预测胸主动脉腔内修复术后的手术难度及主动脉相关再干预情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):912-920.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.451. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
The significance of endoleaks in thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术中内漏的意义
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr;25(3):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
10
Open surgery versus endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms.开放性手术与血管内修复破裂性胸主动脉瘤。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.135. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后双能计算机断层扫描检测内漏诊断准确性的荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11717-8.
2
Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes between endovascular and open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸降主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复的短期和长期结果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2662-2674. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002230.
3
Prognostic Impact of Pulmonary Diseases in 952 Patients with Thoracic and/or Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
952例胸主动脉和/或腹主动脉瘤患者肺部疾病的预后影响
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 19;13(20):6247. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206247.
4
Endovascular Repair in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: A 10-Year Single Center Experience.钝性胸主动脉损伤的血管腔内修复:一项为期10年的单中心经验
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55327. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55327. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Costs of endovascular and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.胸主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的成本。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad378.
6
Simultaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Combined with Saccular Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤合并囊状胸主动脉瘤的同期血管内动脉瘤修复术
Vasc Specialist Int. 2023 Sep 25;39:29. doi: 10.5758/vsi.230075.
7
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Supra-Aortic Trunk Revascularization is Associated with Increased Risk of Periprocedural Ischemic Stroke.胸主动脉腔内修复术伴主动脉弓部血运重建与围手术期缺血性卒中风险增加相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
Simultaneous Endovascular Repair Is Not Associated With Increased Risk for Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Pathologies: Early and Midterm Outcomes.同期血管腔内修复与胸主动脉和腹主动脉病变风险增加无关:早期和中期结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 27;9:883708. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.883708. eCollection 2022.
9
1-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of the Ankura II Thoracic Endoprosthesis for the Endovascular Treatment of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections.安库拉II型胸段血管内假体治疗斯坦福B型主动脉夹层多中心随机对照试验的1年结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 15;9:805585. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.805585. eCollection 2022.
10
Asymptomatic Giant Aneurysm of the Arteria Lusoria Treated by Debranching and Aneurysmal Resection.采用去分支及动脉瘤切除术治疗的无症状性迷走动脉巨大动脉瘤。
Vasc Specialist Int. 2022 Mar 21;38:3. doi: 10.5758/vsi.210069.