• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:60例单术者学习曲线分析]

[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of a single-surgeon learning curve of 60 cases].

作者信息

Zheng Wei, Wu Xin, Zhang Lei, Song Gang, Zhang Zheng, Gong Kan, Song Yi, Li Xue-song, He Zhi-song, Zhou Li-qun

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Aug 18;44(4):558-62.

PMID:22898846
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the changes in perioperative outcomes that might refect progress along the learning curving by a single-surgeon's experience in our institution with laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC).

METHODS

This report was conducted between May 2004 and January 2012 in 60 patients (9 women and 51 men) who underwent LRC for bladder cancer. The mean patient age was (60.8±11.4) years, and mean BMI was (23.9±2.7) kg/m(2). We divided the patients into 3 groups (group A, group B, and group C; each group had twenty patients) by the time, and compared the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay among the three groups.

RESULTS

The mean intraoperative blood loss was (799.2±717.8) mL, the mean operative time was (420.2±119.8) minutes, and the mean hospital stay was (15.7±11.0) d; There was no statistically significant difference in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores and BMI among the three groups (P>0.05). Their operative time was (497.5±131.2), (413.6±75.6) and (349.4±100.2) minutes, respectively, for each group, P<0.001. The intraoperative blood loss was (1 080.0±1 028.8), (862.5±510.6) and (455.5±262.3) mL, for each group, P=0.018. The hospital stay was (20.8±13.5), (16.4±10.6) and (9.8±4.4) d, for each group, P=0.005. However, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Our experience of LRC appears to be favorable with reduction in blood loss, operative time and hospital stay with increasing experience. The curving shows a significant decline at 2 different breakpoints: after the first 20 cases, and after 40 cases.

摘要

目的

通过单一外科医生在我们机构进行腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)的经验,评估围手术期结果的变化,这些变化可能反映学习曲线的进展。

方法

本报告于2004年5月至2012年1月对60例因膀胱癌接受LRC的患者(9例女性和51例男性)进行。患者平均年龄为(60.8±11.4)岁,平均体重指数为(23.9±2.7)kg/m²。我们根据时间将患者分为3组(A组、B组和C组;每组20例患者),并比较三组之间的手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间。

结果

术中平均出血量为(799.2±717.8)mL,平均手术时间为(420.2±119.8)分钟,平均住院时间为(15.7±11.0)天;三组患者在年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和体重指数方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。每组的手术时间分别为(497.5±131.2)、(413.6±75.6)和(349.4±100.2)分钟,P<0.001。每组术中出血量分别为(1080.0±1028.8)、(862.5±510.6)和(455.5±262.3)mL,P=0.018。每组住院时间分别为(20.8±13.5)、(16.4±10.6)和(9.8±4.4)天,P=0.005。然而,三组患者术后并发症无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的LRC经验似乎良好,随着经验增加,出血量、手术时间和住院时间均有所减少。学习曲线在2个不同的转折点出现显著下降:前20例之后,以及40例之后。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of a single-surgeon learning curve of 60 cases].[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:60例单术者学习曲线分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Aug 18;44(4):558-62.
2
[LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AT HIROSHIMA CITY ASA HOSPITAL].[广岛市立ASA医院的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2018;109(1):1-6. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.109.1.
3
Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.拉丁美洲一家参考中心开放性与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):635-41. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168.
4
Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy Versus Extraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy: Is the Extraperitoneal Technique Rewarding?腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术与腹膜外根治性膀胱切除术:腹膜外技术是否值得采用?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Aug;13(4):e271-e277. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
5
Open versus laparoscopy-assisted radical cystectomy: results of a prospective study.开放性与腹腔镜辅助根治性膀胱切除术:一项前瞻性研究的结果
J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):325-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0224.
6
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder - what is the effect of the learning curve on outcomes?机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)联合体内新膀胱 - 学习曲线对结果有何影响?
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):100-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12347. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
Two-Port Approach Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy.双端口入路与标准腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1030-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0161. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
[Treatment outcome of laparoscopic radical cystectomy at a single institution].[单机构腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的治疗结果]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):651-6. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.104.651.
9
Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术实施到巩固阶段的评估:内部验证。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;44(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
[Evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: Morbidity and oncological results].[评估腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗癌症的学习曲线:发病率和肿瘤学结果]
Prog Urol. 2019 Jan;29(1):50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:系统评价和比较研究的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 May 16;9(5):e95667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095667. eCollection 2014.