• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲一家参考中心开放性与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结果

Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.

作者信息

Tobias-Machado Marcos, Said Danniel Frade, Mitre Anuar Ibrahim, Pompeo Alexandre, Pompeo Antonio Carlos Lima

机构信息

Departmento de Urologia, Seção de Urologia Oncológica da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brasil.

Departamento de Urologia - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):635-41. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168
PMID:26401854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4756990/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences of peri-operatory and oncological outcomes between Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Open Radical Cystectomy in our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 50 patients were included in this non randomized match-pair analysis: 25 patients who had undergone Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (Group-1) and 25 patients with similar characteristics who had undergone Open Radical Cystectomy (Group-2). The patients were operated from January 2005 to December 2012 in a single Institution.

RESULTS

Mean operative time for groups 1 and 2 were 350 and 280 minutes (p=0.03) respectively. Mean blood loss was 330 mL for group 1 and 580 mL for group 2 (p=0.04). Intraoperative transfusion rate was 0% and 36% for groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.005). Perioperative complication rate was similar between groups. Mean time to oral intake was 2 days for group 1 and 3 days for group 2 (p=0.08). Median hospital stay was 7 days for group 1 and 13 for group 2 (p=0.04). There were no differences in positive surgical margins and overall survival, between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a reference center with pelvic laparoscopic expertise, Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy may be considered a safe procedure with similar complication rate of Open Radical Cystectomy. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy is more time consuming, with reduced bleeding and transfusion rate. Hospital stay seems to be shorter. Oncologically no difference was observed in our mid-term follow-up.

摘要

目的

评估我院腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在围手术期及肿瘤学结局方面的差异。

材料与方法

本非随机配对分析共纳入50例患者:25例行腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗浸润性膀胱癌的患者(第1组)和25例具有相似特征的行开放性根治性膀胱切除术的患者(第2组)。这些患者于2005年1月至2012年12月在同一机构接受手术。

结果

第1组和第2组的平均手术时间分别为350分钟和280分钟(p = 0.03)。第1组平均失血量为330 mL,第2组为580 mL(p = 0.04)。第1组和第2组的术中输血率分别为0%和36%(p = 0.005)。两组围手术期并发症发生率相似。第1组经口进食的平均时间为2天,第2组为3天(p = 0.08)。第1组的中位住院时间为7天,第2组为13天(p = 0.04)。两组在手术切缘阳性率和总生存率方面无差异。

结论

在具备盆腔腹腔镜技术专长的参考中心,腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术可被视为一种安全的手术,其并发症发生率与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相似。腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术耗时更长,但出血和输血率降低。住院时间似乎更短。在我们的中期随访中,未观察到肿瘤学方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ca/4756990/ab8c290fb96f/1677-5538-ibju-41-4-0635-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ca/4756990/1701f849db6b/1677-5538-ibju-41-4-0635-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ca/4756990/ab8c290fb96f/1677-5538-ibju-41-4-0635-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ca/4756990/1701f849db6b/1677-5538-ibju-41-4-0635-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ca/4756990/ab8c290fb96f/1677-5538-ibju-41-4-0635-gf02.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.拉丁美洲一家参考中心开放性与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):635-41. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168.
2
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion: a single center experience of 48 cases with three years of follow-up.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术及体外尿流改道术:单中心48例患者三年随访经验
Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.056.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱前列腺切除术治疗局限性膀胱癌的3年肿瘤学随访比较:单中心经验
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2340-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.020. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
4
Open versus laparoscopy-assisted radical cystectomy: results of a prospective study.开放性与腹腔镜辅助根治性膀胱切除术:一项前瞻性研究的结果
J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):325-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0224.
5
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single institute comparative analysis.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:单机构对比分析
Urol Int. 2013;91(1):109-12. doi: 10.1159/000350237. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
7
Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery.膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术:腹腔镜手术与开放手术的并发症发生率
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):554-9; discussion 559. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
8
[LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER].[腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌]
Vopr Onkol. 2015;61(3):352-61.
9
Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: "pure laparoscopic" and "open-assisted laparoscopic" approaches.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期结局:“纯腹腔镜”和“开放辅助腹腔镜”手术方式
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):910-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.012.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with bladder cancer compared to laparoscopic and open surgery: Perioperative outcomes of a single-center experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术与腹腔镜和开放手术相比,是一种安全有效的治疗膀胱癌的方法:单中心经验的围手术期结果。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing surgical site wound infection after laparoscopic and open radical cystectomies in patients with bladder cancer.比较腹腔镜和开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的手术部位伤口感染。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14718. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14718.
2
Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for male octogenarians with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的 80 岁以上男性患者的可行性和安全性。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11816-7.
3
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in 607 patients with bladder cancer: Comparative survival analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes after laparoscopic open-assisted radical cystectomy: a matched-pair analysis.腹腔镜开放辅助根治性膀胱切除术后肿瘤学和功能结局的长期评估:配对分析
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1455-61. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1245-1. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
2
A prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes with 5-year follow-upT Lin et al.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:5 年随访的围手术期和肿瘤学结果 T Lin 等人
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):842-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.777. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
3
腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗 607 例膀胱癌患者的比较生存分析。
Int J Urol. 2021 Jun;28(6):673-680. doi: 10.1111/iju.14537. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
4
Perioperative recovery in different urinary reconstruction approaches of radical cystectomy: Are the advantages of laparoscopy consistent?根治性膀胱切除术不同尿路重建方法的围手术期恢复:腹腔镜手术的优势是否一致?
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):390-398. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_227_19.
What about conventional laparoscopic radical cystectomy? Cost-analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy.
传统腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术如何?开放性与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的成本分析。
J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):410-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0550. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
4
Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.机器人和腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:长期肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
5
Pure laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit: a single surgeon's mid-term outcomes.单纯腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术加回肠导管术:单外科医生的中期结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2013 Jul;54(4):912-20. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.912.
6
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single institute comparative analysis.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:单机构对比分析
Urol Int. 2013;91(1):109-12. doi: 10.1159/000350237. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
7
ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Urinary diversion.2012 年国际膀胱癌咨询委员会-欧洲泌尿外科学会:尿流改道。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.050. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
8
Treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines.肌层浸润性和转移性膀胱癌的治疗:EAU 指南更新。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):1009-18. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.023. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: evaluation of functional and oncological results].[机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:功能及肿瘤学结果评估]
Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Mar;35(3):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for the management of bladder cancer: mid-term oncological outcome.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:中期肿瘤学结果。
Int J Urol. 2010 Jan;17(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02425.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.