Daniels C R, Paul M, Rosofsky R
J Public Health Policy. 1990 Winter;11(4):449-62.
Potential exposure to occupational reproductive hazards raises complex questions regarding health and gender discrimination in the workplace. On the one hand, growing scientific evidence suggests that workplace exposures to either sex can cause a wide range of disorders ranging from infertility to adverse pregnancy outcomes. On the other hand, policies alleging to protect workers from reproductive risks have often reinforced gender inequalities in the workplace. This article sheds new light on this continuing debate through an examination of the policy insights suggested by a recent study of reproductive hazard policies in Massachusetts. In what ways do policies evidenced in this study reflect or differ from historical patterns of protectionism? The article presents a political-legal review of reproductive hazard policies in the workplace, then examines the policy implications of the Massachusetts study, and finally presents the prescriptions for change that are implied by both the historical and contemporary evidence.
接触职业性生殖危害的可能性引发了有关职场健康与性别歧视的复杂问题。一方面,越来越多的科学证据表明,职场中任何一种性别的人接触某些物质都可能导致从不孕到不良妊娠结局等一系列疾病。另一方面,声称保护工人免受生殖风险的政策往往强化了职场中的性别不平等。本文通过审视马萨诸塞州近期一项关于生殖危害政策的研究所提出的政策见解,为这场持续的辩论提供了新的视角。该研究中所证明的政策在哪些方面反映了保护主义的历史模式或与之不同?本文对职场生殖危害政策进行了政治法律审查,接着探讨了马萨诸塞州研究的政策含义,最后提出了历史和当代证据所暗示的变革建议。