Fredrikson M, Tuomisto M, Lundberg U, Melin B
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Psychosom Res. 1990;34(6):675-86. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(90)90112-h.
Thirty healthy nonsmoking men and 30 women underwent a laboratory reactivity assessment with systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) recorded at rest and during behavioral (mirror image tracing, mental arithmetic, color word conflict task and a semistructured Type A interview), and physical tasks (isometric exercise and the cold pressor test). Causal SBP and DBP were measured in a physician's clinic. Four months earlier SBP, DBP and HR had been monitored during a day at work and a day at home. Readings obtained in the clinic, at rest and during stress in the laboratory were related to real-life levels, reactivity (work-home difference) and variability. For men level of cardiovascular activation at rest and during all stressors in the laboratory correlated with levels at work and at home. The best laboratory/real-life relation was observed for SBP. Systolic blood pressure levels during stress correlated with the work-home difference. Systolic blood pressure reactivity (laboratory stress levels - rest levels) to most behavioral tasks correlated with SBP levels at work and home. Daily variability and reactivity correlated with SBP reactivity to mental arithmetic and the color word conflict task. For women, levels of SBP and HR at rest and during all stressors correlated with SBP and HR at work and at home. The best laboratory/real-life relation for women was observed for HR reactivity. Casual BP in the clinic correlated with work blood pressure but generally not with daily reactivity or variability. We conclude that BP and HR levels measured in the laboratory generalizes to real life BP and HR in both men and women and also to real life SBP reactivity in men. Laboratory induced SBP reactivity also shows a weak relation to real life SBP levels, variability and reactivity in men.
30名健康的非吸烟男性和30名女性接受了实验室反应性评估,记录了静息状态下以及在行为任务(镜像追踪、心算、色词冲突任务和半结构化A型访谈)和身体任务(等长运动和冷加压试验)期间的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和心率(HR)。在医生诊所测量偶测收缩压和舒张压。四个月前,在工作日和在家的一天中监测收缩压、舒张压和心率。在诊所、静息状态下和实验室应激期间获得的读数与现实生活水平、反应性(工作-家庭差异)和变异性相关。对于男性,静息状态下以及实验室中所有应激源期间的心血管激活水平与工作和家庭中的水平相关。观察到收缩压的实验室/现实生活关系最佳。应激期间的收缩压水平与工作-家庭差异相关。大多数行为任务的收缩压反应性(实验室应激水平-静息水平)与工作和家庭中的收缩压水平相关。每日变异性和反应性与心算和色词冲突任务的收缩压反应性相关。对于女性,静息状态下以及所有应激源期间的收缩压和心率水平与工作和家庭中的收缩压和心率相关。观察到女性心率反应性的实验室/现实生活关系最佳。诊所中的偶测血压与工作血压相关,但通常与每日反应性或变异性无关。我们得出结论,实验室测量的血压和心率水平在男性和女性中都能推广到现实生活中的血压和心率,在男性中也能推广到现实生活中的收缩压反应性。实验室诱导的收缩压反应性与男性现实生活中的收缩压水平、变异性和反应性也存在微弱关系。