• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔颌面外科门诊患者镇静评估:失败与并发症。

Evaluation of sedation in oral and maxillofacial surgery in ambulatory patients: failure and complications.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Blacksea Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5):592-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.008
PMID:22901639
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the failure and complication rates of sedation in ambulatory patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out among 619 patients who had undergone maxillofacial surgical procedures under intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Each patient's age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, systemic condition, surgical procedure, complications, and failures were recorded for evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients with ASA I, 199 with ASA II, and 20 with ASA III between the ages of 9 months and 84 years were included in the study. The most common systemic disorders in our patients were mental retardation (35%), hypertension (19%), and epilepsy (15%). Evaluation of the cases revealed 9 complications (1.4%) and 9 sedation failures (1.4%). The complications were bradycardia, postoperative agitation and hallucination, drug reaction, vomiting and nausea, desaturation, and hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results in the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic revealed low complication and failure rates.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在门诊接受口腔颌面外科手术的患者中镇静的失败和并发症发生率。

材料和方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 619 名接受咪达唑仑和芬太尼静脉镇静的口腔颌面外科手术的患者。记录每位患者的年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、全身状况、手术过程、并发症和失败情况以进行评估。

结果

研究共纳入了年龄在 9 个月至 84 岁之间的 400 名 ASA I 级、199 名 ASA II 级和 20 名 ASA III 级患者。我们患者中最常见的全身疾病是智力迟钝(35%)、高血压(19%)和癫痫(15%)。对病例的评估显示有 9 例并发症(1.4%)和 9 例镇静失败(1.4%)。并发症包括心动过缓、术后激越和幻觉、药物反应、呕吐和恶心、血氧饱和度下降和低血压。

结论

我们在口腔颌面外科诊所的结果显示并发症和失败率较低。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of sedation in oral and maxillofacial surgery in ambulatory patients: failure and complications.口腔颌面外科门诊患者镇静评估:失败与并发症。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5):592-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
2
Evaluation of sedation failure in the outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic.门诊口腔颌面外科诊所镇静失败的评估。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;65(4):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.252.
3
Safety of deep sedation in an urban oral and maxillofacial surgery training program.城市口腔颌面外科培训项目中深度镇静的安全性
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;69(8):2112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.04.017.
4
Comparison of methohexital and propofol use in ambulatory procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery.美索比妥与丙泊酚在口腔颌面外科门诊手术中的应用比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):1996-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.028.
5
Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.门诊脊柱手术中清醒镇静的不良反应。
Spine J. 2011 Dec;11(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.028. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
6
Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice.口腔外科医生实施静脉镇静的安全性:后7年的门诊实践
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
7
Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the first 7 years of office practice.口腔外科医生实施静脉镇静的安全性:执业头七年的情况
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Oct;63(10):1478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.320.
8
Safety and efficacy of office-based surgery with monitored anesthesia care/sedation in 4778 consecutive plastic surgery procedures.4778例连续整形外科手术中门诊手术在麻醉监护/镇静下的安全性和有效性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jan;111(1):150-6; discussion 157-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000037756.88297.BC.
9
[Systematic recording of perioperative events associated with anesthesia as quality indicator in ambulatory anesthesia].[将与麻醉相关的围手术期事件进行系统记录作为门诊麻醉质量指标]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000 Mar;47(3):101-7.
10
[Intravenous sedation in implantology].[口腔种植术中的静脉镇静]
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1997 Jan;98(1):57-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications associated with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl sedation in patients undergoing minor oral surgery.小型口腔手术患者静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼镇静相关的并发症。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep;17(3):199-204. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.3.199. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Dexmedetomidine intravenous sedation using a patient-controlled sedation infusion pump: a case report.使用患者自控镇静输注泵进行右美托咪定静脉镇静:一例病例报告。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar;16(1):55-59. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.1.55. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Comparative study of hemodynamic changes caused by diazepam and midazolam during third molar surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
地西泮和咪达唑仑在第三磨牙手术中引起的血流动力学变化的比较研究:一项随机对照试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;19(3):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0488-3. Epub 2015 Feb 25.