Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):713-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
To investigate lessons learned from national policy initiatives in Canada and U.S. with respect to health information technical infrastructure, data standards, and interoperability; and to identify the implications of these lessons for other policy makers, as they guide the future of their own healthcare information technology initiatives.
We performed semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders including health care professionals, chief information officers, and vendors - 29 in Canada and 31 in the U.S., regarding Health Information Technology policy. The informant sample was chosen to provide views from different stakeholder groups, and included both national and regional representation - three Canadian provinces and three U.S. states. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze the data gathered through the interviews.
The informants identified the following key components of successful health IT policy: (1) enables an iterative-incremental management approach to both technology and data standards, (2) addresses the issues around meaningful use and investment already made in existing legacy health IT systems; and (3) capitalizes on the value of data for use in performance and quality measures, public health and research.
Our study has found that successful health information exchange depends on policies that set clear goals and outline intended effects of HIT implementation without being overly prescriptive, and defines frameworks for guiding policy improvement in a continual and systematic manner. The success of health information exchange also depends on the ability to manage an iterative-incremental approach to technology and data standards, starting from small data sets with high impact on specific care and then gradually expanding toward more comprehensive data sets with an increased emphasis on secondary uses of data.
调查加拿大和美国在卫生信息技术基础设施、数据标准和互操作性方面的国家政策举措中吸取的经验教训;并确定这些经验教训对其他政策制定者的意义,因为他们将指导自己医疗保健信息技术计划的未来。
我们对关键意见领袖进行了半结构化访谈,包括加拿大的 29 名和美国的 31 名医疗保健专业人员、首席信息官和供应商,了解卫生信息技术政策。信息提供者样本的选择是为了提供来自不同利益相关者群体的观点,并包括来自加拿大三个省和美国三个州的国家和地区代表。采用扎根理论方法对通过访谈收集的数据进行分析。
信息提供者确定了成功的卫生信息技术政策的以下关键组成部分:(1)使技术和数据标准的迭代式增量管理方法成为可能,(2)解决围绕有意义使用和已在现有遗留卫生信息技术系统中进行投资的问题;(3)利用数据在绩效和质量措施、公共卫生和研究中的价值。
我们的研究发现,成功的卫生信息交换取决于政策,这些政策设定了明确的目标,并概述了 HIT 实施的预期效果,而不会过于具体,并定义了以持续和系统的方式指导政策改进的框架。卫生信息交换的成功还取决于以迭代式增量方法管理技术和数据标准的能力,从对特定护理具有高影响的小数据集开始,然后逐步扩展到更全面的数据集,并更加注重数据的二次利用。