• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:单中心2836例患者的12年经验

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: twelve years of experience with 2836 patients at a single center.

作者信息

Demirbas Murat, Samli Murat, Karalar Mustafa, Kose Ahmet C

机构信息

Private Medicabil Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):557-61.

PMID:22903477
Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for managing ureteral stones in patients who were treated during a 12-year period at a single center in Turkey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 3300 patients who had single ureteral stone and underwent SWL between January 1999 and March 2011. Medical records from 2836 (85%) patients were available for evaluation. Only patients with radiopaque stones of 5- to 15-mm diameter were included. All procedures were carried out by an experienced urologist (ACK). Patients with proximal ureteral calculi were treated in supine position. Those with mid or distal ureteral stones were treated in modified prone position. Persistence of radiologic image of the stone after three SWL sessions or no spontaneous passage of stone fragments after one month of follow-up was defined as treatment failure. Treatment success was defined as radiologically confirmed fragmentation and spontaneous passage of the stone.

RESULTS

The success rates for the subgroups with stones located in the proximal, mid, and distal ureter were 85.1%, 83.9%, and 88.4%, respectively (P = .257). The success rates for individuals with smaller stones (≤ 10 mm) in the proximal, mid, and distal ureter were 90%, 85.8%, and 90.4%, respectively (P = .07). The corresponding rates for individuals with larger stones (> 10 mm) were 75.3%, 81.3%, and 81.6%, respectively (P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective evaluation of this large patient series reveals that SWL is effective for treating stones in the proximal, mid, and distal ureter.

摘要

目的

回顾性分析在土耳其某单一中心接受治疗的患者中,体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗输尿管结石的疗效。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了1999年1月至2011年3月期间3300例患有单一输尿管结石并接受SWL治疗的患者。其中2836例(85%)患者的病历可供评估。仅纳入直径为5至15毫米的不透射线结石患者。所有手术均由经验丰富的泌尿科医生(ACK)进行。近端输尿管结石患者采用仰卧位治疗。中下段输尿管结石患者采用改良俯卧位治疗。三次SWL治疗后结石的放射影像持续存在或随访1个月后结石碎片未自发排出定义为治疗失败。治疗成功定义为经放射学证实结石碎裂并自发排出。

结果

结石位于近端、中段和远端输尿管的亚组成功率分别为85.1%、83.9%和88.4%(P = 0.257)。近端、中段和远端输尿管中较小结石(≤10毫米)患者的成功率分别为90%、85.8%和90.4%(P = 0.07)。较大结石(>10毫米)患者的相应成功率分别为75.3%、81.3%和81.6%(P = 0.09)。

结论

我们对这个大型患者系列的回顾性评估表明,SWL对治疗近端、中段和远端输尿管结石有效。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: twelve years of experience with 2836 patients at a single center.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:单中心2836例患者的12年经验
Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):557-61.
2
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管远端结石:经臀入路可显著提高结石清除率。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
3
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
4
Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with patients rotated supine or rotated prone for treating ureteral stones: a case-control study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石时患者仰卧位或俯卧位旋转的疗效:一项病例对照研究
J Endourol. 2006 Mar;20(3):170-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.170.
5
Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation.输尿管结石的两年经验:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜操作对比
J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):501-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.501.
6
Predictors of success for stone fragmentation and stone-free rate after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石后结石碎裂及结石清除率的成功预测因素。
Urol J. 2012 Summer;9(3):549-52.
7
When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?何时适合采用开放性输尿管取石术治疗输尿管结石?
Int J Urol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1385-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01585.x.
8
Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.仰卧经臀位与俯卧位在输尿管下段结石体外冲击波碎石术中的比较
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性远端输尿管结石:尿路梗阻程度会影响治疗成功率吗?
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):237-40. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582822.
10
Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments.尿石症的压电冲击波碎石术:肾脏和输尿管治疗中结石深度的比较研究
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):699-703. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.699.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficiency of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones: An Unjustly Forgotten Option?体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:一个被不公正遗忘的选择?
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28671. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.既往冲击波碎石术失败是否会影响输尿管镜检查的结果?-一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2122-2132. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-39.