• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往冲击波碎石术失败是否会影响输尿管镜检查的结果?-一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Wei, Peng Liao, Di Xingpeng, Gao Xiaoshuai, Wei Xin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2122-2132. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-39.

DOI:10.21037/tau-21-39
PMID:34159093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS).

METHODS

An exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were conducted to find eligible studies before October 2020. Result variables consisting stone-free rate (SFR), operation time and postoperative modified Clavien grade I-IV complications were pooled utilizing RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 2413 individuals were included. Pooled results revealed that the salvage URS after failed SWL was similar to URS performed primarily regarding SFR [odds ratio (OR) =0.84, P=0.15] and operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) =6.79, P=0.19]. Additionally, no statistically significant differences concerning fever (OR: 1.36; P=0.32), hematuria (OR: 0.81; P=0.75), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.57; P=0.28), renal colic (OR: 1.94; P=0.50), ureteral perforation (OR: 1.44; P=0.46), ureteral avulsion (OR: 1.21; P=0.83), stone migration (OR: 0.92; P=0.86) and sepsis (OR: 0.46; P=0.38) were observed between salvage URS and primary URS group.

DISCUSSION

The success rates and complications of URS were not impacted by previous unsuccessful SWL. The salvage URS is equally effective and safe to primary URS.

摘要

背景

确定既往冲击波碎石术(SWL)失败是否会影响输尿管镜检查(URS)的结果。

方法

在2020年10月之前,对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和考克兰图书馆进行了详尽检索,以查找符合条件的研究。利用RevMan 5.3汇总了包括无石率(SFR)、手术时间和术后改良Clavien I-IV级并发症在内的结果变量。

结果

纳入了7项研究,共2413例个体。汇总结果显示,SWL失败后补救性URS与初次进行的URS在SFR方面相似[比值比(OR)=0.84,P=0.15],在手术时间方面也相似[加权平均差(WMD)=6.79,P=0.19]。此外,在补救性URS组和初次URS组之间,在发热(OR:1.36;P=0.32)、血尿(OR:0.81;P=0.75)、尿路感染(OR:1.57;P=0.28)、肾绞痛(OR:1.94;P=0.50)、输尿管穿孔(OR:1.44;P=0.46)、输尿管撕脱(OR:1.21;P=0.83)、结石迁移(OR:0.92;P=0.86)和脓毒症(OR:0.46;P=0.38)方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

讨论

既往SWL失败并未影响URS的成功率和并发症。补救性URS与初次URS同样有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/60c7d6e96126/tau-10-05-2122-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/3994994a80e0/tau-10-05-2122-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/850c714a0802/tau-10-05-2122-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/e59075c4fa58/tau-10-05-2122-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/4305c47162f7/tau-10-05-2122-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/2b59baf0e4a8/tau-10-05-2122-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/60c7d6e96126/tau-10-05-2122-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/3994994a80e0/tau-10-05-2122-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/850c714a0802/tau-10-05-2122-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/e59075c4fa58/tau-10-05-2122-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/4305c47162f7/tau-10-05-2122-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/2b59baf0e4a8/tau-10-05-2122-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f8/8185663/60c7d6e96126/tau-10-05-2122-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.既往冲击波碎石术失败是否会影响输尿管镜检查的结果?-一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2122-2132. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-39.
2
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
3
Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的成本效益比较
World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1842-2. Epub 2016 May 5.
4
Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs. flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 7;9:925481. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.925481. eCollection 2022.
5
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
6
Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的成本效益比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):639-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0669. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
7
Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)失败后输尿管镜检查(URS)的补充治疗与钬激光治疗原发性 URS 碎石术治疗大于 10mm 的输尿管上段结石。
BMC Urol. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00892-7.
8
Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.输尿管镜检查治疗结石比体外冲击波碎石术更具成本效益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1783-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2320-9. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313.
10
Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children.小儿大于1 cm上尿路结石治疗中钬-钇铝石榴石激光微型半硬性输尿管镜检查与冲击波碎石术的比较
Arab J Urol. 2020 Mar 23;18(2):106-111. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105.

本文引用的文献

1
Fluoroless versus conventional ureteroscopy for urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无氟与传统输尿管镜治疗尿路结石的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jun;73(3):299-308. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04042-4. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Is androgen deprivation therapy protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and related complications in prostate cancer patients?
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Dec;72(6):778-779. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04021-7. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Regional General Anesthesia for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.区域麻醉用于逆行性肾内手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1121-1128. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0188. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)后对输尿管镜取石术(ureterorenoscopy)结果的影响以及 SWL 失败后治疗上段输尿管结石的最佳输尿管镜取石术时机。
World J Urol. 2020 Mar;38(3):769-774. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02809-4. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
Does Previous Failed Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment Have an Influence on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Outcome?既往冲击波碎石治疗失败是否会对逆行性肾内手术结果产生影响?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):627-630. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0487. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Life-threatening complications after ureteroscopy for urinary stones: survey and systematic literature review.输尿管镜取石术后的危及生命并发症:调查与系统文献综述
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Oct;69(5):421-431. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02787-4. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
8
Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study.与输尿管镜检查(URS)治疗尿路结石相关的并发症:腔内泌尿外科协会URS全球临床研究办公室研究
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):675-681. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
9
The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗中等大小(10 - 20毫米)肾结石的成效。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0857-2. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stones after shock wave lithotripsy failure: Is it safe and efficient or dangerous?冲击波碎石失败后输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石:它是安全有效的还是危险的?
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):E718-22. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2745. Epub 2015 Oct 13.