Division of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042832. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
The Mallett Unit is a clinical test designed to detect the fixation disparity that is most likely to occur in the presence of a decompensated heterophoria. It measures the associated phoria, which is the "aligning prism" needed to nullify the subjective disparity. The technique has gained widespread acceptance within professions such as optometry, for investigating suspected cases of decompensating heterophoria; it is, however, rarely used by orthoptists and ophthalmologists. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fusional vergence reserves, measured routinely by both orthoptists and ophthalmologists to detect heterophoria decompensation, were correlated with aligning prism (associated phoria) in a normal clinical population.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Aligning prism (using the Mallett Unit) and fusional vergence reserves (using a prism bar) were measured in 500 participants (mean 41.63 years; standard deviation 11.86 years) at 40 cm and 6 m. At 40 cm a strong correlation (p<0.001) between base in aligning prism (Exo FD) and positive fusional reserves was found. Of the participants with zero aligning prism 30% had reduced fusional reserves. At 6 m a weak correlation between base out aligning prism (Eso FD) and negative fusional reserves was found to break (p = 0.01) and to recovery (p = 0.048). Of the participants with zero aligning prism 12% reported reduced fusional reserves.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For near vision testing, the strong inverse correlation between base in aligning prism (Exo FD) and fusional vergence reserves supports the notion that both measures are indicators of decompensation of heterophoria. For distance vision testing and for those patients reporting zero aligning prism further research is required to determine why the relationship appears to be weak/non-existent?
马莱特单位是一种临床测试,旨在检测最有可能出现在失代偿性隐斜视的固视差异。它测量相关的斜视,这是消除主观差异所需的“对齐棱镜”。该技术在验光等专业领域得到了广泛认可,用于调查疑似失代偿性隐斜视的病例;然而,它很少被斜视治疗师和眼科医生使用。本研究旨在探讨斜视治疗师和眼科医生常规测量的融合聚散储备是否与正常临床人群中的对齐棱镜(相关斜视)相关。
方法/主要发现:在 500 名参与者(平均年龄 41.63 岁;标准差 11.86 岁)中,在 40 厘米和 6 米处测量对齐棱镜(使用马莱特单位)和融合聚散储备(使用棱镜棒)。在 40 厘米处,发现基底向外对齐棱镜(Exo FD)与正融合储备之间存在很强的相关性(p<0.001)。在没有对齐棱镜的参与者中,有 30%的人融合储备减少。在 6 米处,基底向外对齐棱镜(Eso FD)与负融合储备之间发现弱相关性,该相关性中断(p = 0.01)并恢复(p = 0.048)。在没有对齐棱镜的参与者中,有 12%的人报告融合储备减少。
结论/意义:对于近视力测试,基底向外对齐棱镜(Eso FD)与融合聚散储备之间的强负相关支持这样一种观点,即这两种测量都是隐斜视失代偿的指标。对于远视力测试,以及对于那些报告没有对齐棱镜的患者,需要进一步研究以确定为什么这种关系似乎很弱/不存在?