Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;26(4):859-69. doi: 10.1037/a0029674. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is an effective treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) that focuses on resolving ambivalence and increasing commitment to positive behavior change. Although MI has a well-developed clinical theory, research findings have been mixed in supporting its view of how change occurs. The primary aim of this pilot study was to test hypothesized MI active ingredients and mechanisms of change in reducing drinking during the initiation of a behavior change episode. Problem drinkers (N = 89) seeking treatment were randomly assigned to MI, relational MI without directive elements (spirit-only MI [SOMI]), or a self-change (SC) control condition. Participants were followed during an 8-week treatment period. The first 2 of 4 treatment sessions were videotaped and coded for fidelity, discriminability, and change talk. Overall, conditions demonstrated high fidelity. As predicted, change talk significantly increased in MI relative to the SOMI condition. Drinking was significantly reduced at end treatment, but the reduction was equivalent across conditions. Post hoc analyses found that MI reduced drinking more rapidly than SOMI and SC and that increased change talk mediated the effects of MI relative to SOMI during the week immediately following the first session. Findings are discussed in the context of the pilot nature of the study and the relative absence of experimental tests of mechanisms of behavior change in SUD treatment research.
动机性访谈(MI)是一种有效的治疗物质使用障碍(SUDs)的方法,其重点是解决矛盾心理并增强对积极行为改变的承诺。尽管 MI 有一个成熟的临床理论,但支持其改变发生方式的研究结果却存在差异。本试点研究的主要目的是测试假设的 MI 活性成分和变化机制,以减少行为改变期开始时的饮酒量。寻求治疗的问题饮酒者(N=89)被随机分配到 MI、没有指导元素的关系 MI(仅精神 MI [SOMI])或自我改变(SC)对照组。参与者在 8 周的治疗期间接受随访。前 4 次治疗中的前 2 次被录像并进行了可信度、可区分性和变化谈话的编码。总体而言,条件表现出高度的可信度。正如预测的那样,与 SOMI 条件相比,MI 中的变化谈话显著增加。治疗结束时饮酒量显著减少,但各条件之间的减少量相当。事后分析发现,MI 比 SOMI 和 SC 更快地减少了饮酒量,并且在第一次治疗后的第一周内,增加的变化谈话介导了 MI 相对于 SOMI 的效果。研究结果在研究的试点性质和 SUD 治疗研究中相对缺乏行为改变机制的实验测试的背景下进行了讨论。