Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):754-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029639. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
The present study examines two core therapeutic principles of Motivational Interviewing (MI) with alcohol and other substance use disorders. Specifically, therapist focus on client ambivalence and commitment to change, as well as a more general indicator of goal assessment, were tested as process predictors of subsequent alcohol use across four sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy. Participants were adult alcohol users involved in a large multisite clinical trial (Project MATCH; two arms Aftercare [AC] and Outpatient [OP]). A series of multilevel models examined the effect of proposed MI ingredients on alcohol use (percent days abstinent; drinks per drinking day) over a 12-week treatment period, and whether these effects interacted with time and client baseline motivation. Therapist effort to elicit client commitment to change alcohol use was associated with greater rates of abstinence among both AC and OP participants, and reduced drinking quantity among OP participants. However, therapist focus on ambivalence was associated with greater drinking quantity among OP participants, and when motivation was low, among AC participants. Goal assessment was a marginal to nonsignificant predictor across outcomes, and all interactions with time were nonsignificant. Therapist-reported treatment foci are important to subsequent patterns of drinking within a multisession MI, but the role of ambivalence and discrepancy is worthy of further clinical and empirical consideration.
本研究考察了动机访谈(MI)治疗酒精和其他物质使用障碍的两个核心治疗原则。具体来说,治疗师对患者的矛盾心理和改变的承诺,以及更一般的目标评估指标,作为动机增强治疗四个疗程后后续酒精使用的过程预测指标进行了测试。参与者为参与大型多地点临床试验(MATCH 项目;两个后护理 [AC] 和门诊 [OP] 臂)的成年酒精使用者。一系列多层次模型检验了所提出的 MI 成分对酒精使用(禁欲天数百分比;饮酒天数的饮酒量)的影响,以及这些影响是否与时间和患者的基线动机相互作用。治疗师努力引起患者改变酒精使用的承诺与 AC 和 OP 参与者的禁欲率增加有关,与 OP 参与者的饮酒量减少有关。然而,治疗师对矛盾心理的关注与 OP 参与者的饮酒量增加有关,而当动机较低时,与 AC 参与者的饮酒量增加有关。目标评估是所有结果的边缘到非显著预测指标,所有与时间的相互作用均无显著性。治疗师报告的治疗重点对多疗程 MI 中的后续饮酒模式很重要,但矛盾心理和差异的作用值得进一步的临床和实证考虑。