• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Therapist focus on ambivalence and commitment: a longitudinal analysis of Motivational Interviewing treatment ingredients.治疗师关注矛盾心理和承诺:动机访谈治疗成分的纵向分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):754-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029639. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
2
Do improvements in motivational language predict alcohol use in motivational interviewing? Ambivalence matters.动机性语言的改善是否能预测动机性访谈中的饮酒行为?矛盾心理很重要。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;92(7):388-398. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000889.
3
The role of the working alliance in treatment for alcohol problems.工作联盟在酒精问题治疗中的作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;29(2):371-81. doi: 10.1037/adb0000058. Epub 2015 May 11.
4
Effect of a significant other on client change talk in motivational interviewing.重要他人对动机性访谈中来访者改变话题的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Feb;81(1):35-46. doi: 10.1037/a0030881. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
5
The Impact of Therapists' Responses to Resistance to Change: A Sequential Analysis of Therapist Client Interactions in Motivational Interviewing.治疗师对改变阻力的反应的影响:动机性访谈中治疗师与来访者互动的序列分析
Alcohol Alcohol. 2019 Mar 1;54(2):173-176. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agz003.
6
Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments.治疗师与来访者关于饮酒与应对方式的讨论:对三种循证酒精使用障碍治疗中治疗对话的序列分析
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):1011-20. doi: 10.1111/add.13313. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
7
Examining motivational interviewing's effect on confidence and commitment using daily data.使用每日数据检验动机性访谈对信心和承诺的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107472. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Under what conditions? Therapist and client characteristics moderate the role of change talk in brief motivational intervention.在什么条件下?治疗师和来访者的特征会调节改变谈话在简短动机性干预中的作用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar;84(3):211-20. doi: 10.1037/a0039918. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
9
Which Individual Therapist Behaviors Elicit Client Change Talk and Sustain Talk in Motivational Interviewing?在动机性访谈中,哪些个体治疗师行为会引发来访者的改变谈话并维持谈话?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Feb;61:60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence?客户语言作为动机性访谈效果的调节因素:证据何在?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):40s-47s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00492.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Age as a moderator of motivational interviewing and nondirective client-centered psychotherapy for alcohol use disorder: An exploratory study.年龄对动机性访谈和非指导性以客户为中心的心理治疗酒精使用障碍的调节作用:一项探索性研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Mar;47(3):527-539. doi: 10.1111/acer.15015. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
2
Examining motivational interviewing's effect on confidence and commitment using daily data.使用每日数据检验动机性访谈对信心和承诺的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107472. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Exploration of treatment matching of problem drinker characteristics to motivational interviewing and non-directive client-centered psychotherapy.探讨问题饮酒者特征与动机性访谈和非指导性以患者为中心的心理疗法的治疗匹配。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Mar;86:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
4
Compounding risk: An examination of associations between spirituality/religiosity, drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence among heavy drinking young adults.复合风险:对大量饮酒的年轻人的精神性/宗教信仰、饮酒动机与酒精相关矛盾心理之间关联的考察。
Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;63:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments.治疗师与来访者关于饮酒与应对方式的讨论:对三种循证酒精使用障碍治疗中治疗对话的序列分析
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):1011-20. doi: 10.1111/add.13313. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI's key causal model.动机性访谈的技术假设:对动机性访谈关键因果模型的荟萃分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):973-83. doi: 10.1037/a0036833. Epub 2014 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques.探究固定效应和多层回归中的交互作用:推断和图形技术。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2005;40(3):373-400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5.
2
Does change talk during brief motivational interventions with young men predict change in alcohol use?简短动机干预中与年轻人的改变谈话是否能预测其饮酒行为的改变?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Feb;44(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3
Recent advances in behavioral addiction treatments: focusing on mechanisms of change.行为成瘾治疗的最新进展:关注改变的机制。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):382-9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-011-0220-4.
4
Does readiness to change predict in-session motivational language? Correspondence between two conceptualizations of client motivation.改变准备度能否预测会谈中动机性语言?两种客户动机概念化之间的一致性。
Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03421.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
5
Counselor motivational interviewing skills and young adult change talk articulation during brief motivational interventions.辅导员的激励性访谈技巧与青少年在简短动机性访谈中表达改变意愿的能力。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
6
The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes.动机式晤谈的语言和反馈:咨询师语言、来访者语言和来访者饮酒结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;24(2):190-7. doi: 10.1037/a0018749.
7
The route to change: within-session predictors of change plan completion in a motivational interview.改变的途径:动机性访谈中改变计划完成的会话内预测因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Apr;38(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
8
From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: a causal chain for motivational interviewing.从会谈中的行为到饮酒结果:动机性访谈的因果链。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1113-24. doi: 10.1037/a0017189.
9
Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.迈向动机性访谈理论
Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):527-37. doi: 10.1037/a0016830.
10
The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses.动机性访谈的有效性和适用性:四项荟萃分析的实用友好综述。
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Nov;65(11):1232-45. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20638.

治疗师关注矛盾心理和承诺:动机访谈治疗成分的纵向分析。

Therapist focus on ambivalence and commitment: a longitudinal analysis of Motivational Interviewing treatment ingredients.

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):754-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029639. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1037/a0029639
PMID:22905897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3650101/
Abstract

The present study examines two core therapeutic principles of Motivational Interviewing (MI) with alcohol and other substance use disorders. Specifically, therapist focus on client ambivalence and commitment to change, as well as a more general indicator of goal assessment, were tested as process predictors of subsequent alcohol use across four sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy. Participants were adult alcohol users involved in a large multisite clinical trial (Project MATCH; two arms Aftercare [AC] and Outpatient [OP]). A series of multilevel models examined the effect of proposed MI ingredients on alcohol use (percent days abstinent; drinks per drinking day) over a 12-week treatment period, and whether these effects interacted with time and client baseline motivation. Therapist effort to elicit client commitment to change alcohol use was associated with greater rates of abstinence among both AC and OP participants, and reduced drinking quantity among OP participants. However, therapist focus on ambivalence was associated with greater drinking quantity among OP participants, and when motivation was low, among AC participants. Goal assessment was a marginal to nonsignificant predictor across outcomes, and all interactions with time were nonsignificant. Therapist-reported treatment foci are important to subsequent patterns of drinking within a multisession MI, but the role of ambivalence and discrepancy is worthy of further clinical and empirical consideration.

摘要

本研究考察了动机访谈(MI)治疗酒精和其他物质使用障碍的两个核心治疗原则。具体来说,治疗师对患者的矛盾心理和改变的承诺,以及更一般的目标评估指标,作为动机增强治疗四个疗程后后续酒精使用的过程预测指标进行了测试。参与者为参与大型多地点临床试验(MATCH 项目;两个后护理 [AC] 和门诊 [OP] 臂)的成年酒精使用者。一系列多层次模型检验了所提出的 MI 成分对酒精使用(禁欲天数百分比;饮酒天数的饮酒量)的影响,以及这些影响是否与时间和患者的基线动机相互作用。治疗师努力引起患者改变酒精使用的承诺与 AC 和 OP 参与者的禁欲率增加有关,与 OP 参与者的饮酒量减少有关。然而,治疗师对矛盾心理的关注与 OP 参与者的饮酒量增加有关,而当动机较低时,与 AC 参与者的饮酒量增加有关。目标评估是所有结果的边缘到非显著预测指标,所有与时间的相互作用均无显著性。治疗师报告的治疗重点对多疗程 MI 中的后续饮酒模式很重要,但矛盾心理和差异的作用值得进一步的临床和实证考虑。