Suppr超能文献

ICH E14 Q & A (R1) 文件:对更新的全面 QT 研究建议的看法。

ICH E14 Q & A (R1) document: perspectives on the updated recommendations on thorough QT studies.

机构信息

Rashmi Shah Consultancy Ltd, Gerrards Cross, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;75(4):959-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04442.x.

Abstract

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidance ICH E14 provides recommendations, focusing on a clinical 'thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study', to evaluate the QT liability of a drug during its development. An Implementation Working Group (IWG) was also established to assist the sponsors with any uncertainties and clarify any ambiguities. In April 2012, the IWG updated its June 2008 version of the Questions and Answers document to address additional issues. These include the gender of the study population, a reasonable approach to evaluating QTc changes in late stage clinical development and the recommended approach to correcting the measured QT interval. This commentary provides our observations and, when appropriate, recommendations, on these issues. We review briefly evidence that suggests that (i) the greater QT effect observed in females is not entirely related to differences in drug exposure and (ii) the Fridericia correction of measured QT interval is adequate for a majority of TQT studies. Until further evidence suggests otherwise, we recommend balanced gender representation in TQT studies, unless warranted otherwise, and for positive studies, subgroup analysis of key data by common demographic variables including the gender and ethnicity. We provide a general scheme for ECG monitoring in late phase clinical trials and consider that while intensive monitoring and centralized reading of ECGs in late phase clinical trials is the norm when a TQT study is positive, there are other circumstances that also call for high quality ECG reading. Therefore, locally read ECGs should only be acceptable as long as accurate high quality ECG data can be guaranteed.

摘要

国际协调会议(ICH)指导原则 ICH E14 提供了建议,重点是进行临床“全面 QT/QTc(TQT)研究”,以评估药物在开发过程中的 QT 风险。还成立了一个实施工作组(IWG),以协助赞助商解决任何不确定性并澄清任何歧义。2012 年 4 月,IWG 更新了其 2008 年 6 月版本的问答文件,以解决其他问题。这些问题包括研究人群的性别、评估晚期临床开发中 QTc 变化的合理方法以及推荐的校正测量 QT 间隔的方法。本评论提供了我们对这些问题的观察结果和适当的建议。我们简要回顾了一些证据,这些证据表明:(i)女性观察到的更大的 QT 效应并不完全与药物暴露的差异有关;(ii)Fridericia 校正测量的 QT 间隔对于大多数 TQT 研究是足够的。在进一步的证据表明相反的情况之前,我们建议在 TQT 研究中平衡性别代表性,除非有其他正当理由,并且对于阳性研究,根据常见的人口统计学变量(包括性别和种族)对关键数据进行亚组分析。我们提供了晚期临床试验中 ECG 监测的一般方案,并认为,当 TQT 研究为阳性时,晚期临床试验中对 ECG 的强化监测和集中解读是常态,但在其他情况下也需要高质量的 ECG 解读。因此,只要能够保证准确的高质量 ECG 数据,本地解读的 ECG 就应该是可以接受的。

相似文献

10
Assay sensitivity in "Hybrid thorough QT/QTc (TQT)" study.“混合全面QT/QTc(TQT)”研究中的检测灵敏度。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):378-384. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535498. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Gender differences in cardiac repolarization following intravenous sotalol administration.静脉注射索他洛尔后心脏复极的性别差异。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;17(1):86-92. doi: 10.1177/1074248411406505. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
4
Automated versus manual measurement of the QT interval and corrected QT interval.QT间期和校正QT间期的自动测量与手动测量
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011 Apr;16(2):156-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00423.x.
6
Improvement and limitation of the reliability of automated QT measurement by recent algorithms.近期算法对自动QT测量可靠性的改进与局限
J Electrocardiol. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验