Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜腹疝修补术中减少腹腔内放置补片粘连的策略。

Strategies to minimize adhesions to intraperitoneally placed mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

作者信息

Tran Hanh, Saliba Lucia, Chandratnam Edward, Turingan Isidro, Hawthorne Wayne

机构信息

University of Sydney, Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

JSLS. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):89-94. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13291597716140.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adhesions to mesh/tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair are often cited as reasons not to adopt its evidence-based superiority over conventional open methods. This pilot study assessed the occurrence of adhesions to full-sized Polypropylene and Gore-tex DualMesh Plus meshes and the possibility for adhesion prevention using fibrin sealant.

METHODS

Two 10-cm to 15-cm pieces of mesh were placed and fixed laparoscopically in pigs (25kg to 55kg). Group I: 2 animals with Polypropylene mesh on one side and DualMesh on other side. Group II: 2 animals with DualMesh on each side with fibrin sealant applied to the periphery of mesh and staples to one side. Group III: 1 animal with 2 pieces of Polypropylene mesh with fibrin sealant applied to the entire mesh. All animals underwent laparoscopy 3 months later to assess the extent of adhesions, and full-thickness specimens were removed for histological evaluation.

RESULTS

More Polypropylene mesh was involved in adhesions than DualMesh. However, with the DualMesh involved in adhesions, more of the surface area was involved in forming adhesions than with Polypropylene mesh. None of the implanted DualMesh had visceral adhesions, while 2 out of 3 Polypropylene meshes had adhesions to both the liver and spleen but none to the bowel. Implanted Polypropylene mesh with fibrin sealant had no adhesions. DualMesh had shrunk more significantly than Polypropylene mesh. Histological evaluation showed absence of acute inflammatory response, significantly more chronic inflammatory response to DualMesh compared to Polypropylene and complete mesothelialization with both meshes. There was extensive collagen deposition between Polypropylene mesh fibers, while fibrosis occurred on both sides of DualMesh with synovial metaplasia over its peritoneal surface akin to encapsulation.

CONCLUSIONS

DualMesh caused fewer omental and visceral adhesions than Polypropylene mesh did. Fibrin sealant eliminated adhesions to DualMesh and prevented adhesions to Polypropylene mesh when applied over the entire surface. These results support our current use of DualMesh and fibrin sealant in LVHR.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜腹疝修补术中补片/钉合处的粘连常被视为不采用其相对于传统开放手术的循证优势的原因。本前瞻性研究评估了全尺寸聚丙烯和戈尔泰斯双网加强补片的粘连发生情况,以及使用纤维蛋白密封剂预防粘连的可能性。

方法

通过腹腔镜在猪(25千克至55千克)体内放置并固定两片10厘米至15厘米的补片。第一组:2只动物,一侧使用聚丙烯补片,另一侧使用双网加强补片。第二组:2只动物,两侧均使用双网加强补片,补片周边使用纤维蛋白密封剂,一侧使用吻合钉。第三组:1只动物,两片聚丙烯补片均使用纤维蛋白密封剂。3个月后对所有动物进行腹腔镜检查以评估粘连程度,并取出全层标本进行组织学评估。

结果

聚丙烯补片比双网加强补片更多地卷入粘连。然而,双网加强补片卷入粘连时,其形成粘连的表面积比聚丙烯补片更多。植入的双网加强补片均未出现内脏粘连,而3片聚丙烯补片中的2片与肝脏和脾脏均有粘连,但与肠管无粘连。植入的聚丙烯补片使用纤维蛋白密封剂后无粘连。双网加强补片比聚丙烯补片收缩更明显。组织学评估显示无急性炎症反应,与聚丙烯补片相比,双网加强补片的慢性炎症反应明显更多,两种补片均完全被间皮化。聚丙烯补片纤维之间有大量胶原沉积,而双网加强补片两侧出现纤维化,其腹膜表面有滑膜化生,类似于包裹。

结论

双网加强补片引起的网膜和内脏粘连比聚丙烯补片少。纤维蛋白密封剂消除了与双网加强补片的粘连,并在整个表面应用时防止了与聚丙烯补片的粘连。这些结果支持我们目前在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中使用双网加强补片和纤维蛋白密封剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db57/3407463/a98abfd2c3c4/jls0011228300001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验