Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University, Republicii 37, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Health Educ Res. 2012 Oct;27(5):857-67. doi: 10.1093/her/cys091. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
To promote sun safety by implementing different plans for sunscreen use, different psychological interventions are compared. Self-regulatory strategies such as action planning and coping planning are seen as proximal predictors of actual behavior. The study compares a pure planning intervention with a broader resource communication and examines differential effects at different stages of change. A sun safety online study was designed with two intervention groups (resource communication versus planning) and one control group at two assessment points, 2 weeks apart. Participants (N = 292) were grouped post hoc according to their stage of change, resulting in 51 pre-intenders (no intention to use sunscreen), 102 intenders (high intention but no regular use of sunscreen) and 139 actors (sunscreen use on a regular basis). No overall treatment effects on planning, but an interaction between time, stage and intervention emerged. The resource communication was more effective for pre-intenders, whereas the planning intervention proved more effective for intenders. A planning treatment was more beneficial in motivated individuals, whereas a broader approach was better for unmotivated ones. Findings highlight the potential that stage-matched interventions might have in the context of sun safety promotion.
为了通过实施不同的防晒霜使用计划来促进防晒安全,比较了不同的心理干预措施。自我调节策略,如行动计划和应对计划,被视为实际行为的近端预测指标。本研究将单纯的计划干预与更广泛的资源沟通进行比较,并在不同的变化阶段考察了不同的效果。一项关于太阳安全的在线研究设计了两个干预组(资源沟通与计划)和一个对照组,在两周的两个评估点进行评估。根据他们的变化阶段,参与者(N=292)被事后分为 51 名预意向者(没有使用防晒霜的意向)、102 名意向者(有高度意向但没有定期使用防晒霜)和 139 名行动者(定期使用防晒霜)。计划对规划没有总体治疗效果,但时间、阶段和干预之间出现了相互作用。资源沟通对预意向者更有效,而计划干预对意向者更有效。计划治疗对有动机的个体更有益,而更广泛的方法对无动机的个体更有效。研究结果强调了在太阳安全促进方面,针对特定阶段的干预措施可能具有的潜力。