Cardiology Division, GRB-800, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Circulation. 2012 Sep 25;126(13):1596-604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.129437. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular events in community-based populations have not consistently added information to standard risk factors. A limitation of many previously studied biomarkers is their lack of cardiovascular specificity.
To determine the prognostic value of 3 novel biomarkers induced by cardiovascular stress, we measured soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I in 3428 participants (mean age, 59 years; 53% women) in the Framingham Heart Study. We performed multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards models to assess the individual and combined ability of the biomarkers to predict adverse outcomes. We also constructed a "multimarker" score composed of the 3 biomarkers in addition to B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 years, there were 488 deaths, 336 major cardiovascular events, 162 heart failure events, and 142 coronary events. In multivariable-adjusted models, the 3 new biomarkers were associated with each end point (P<0.001) except coronary events. Individuals with multimarker scores in the highest quartile had a 3-fold risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.7; P<0.001), 6-fold risk of heart failure (6.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-14.8; P<0.001), and 2-fold risk of cardiovascular events (1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.7; P=0.001). Addition of the multimarker score to clinical variables led to significant increases in the c statistic (P=0.005 or lower) and net reclassification improvement (P=0.001 or lower).
Multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are detectable in ambulatory individuals and add prognostic value to standard risk factors for predicting death, overall cardiovascular events, and heart failure.
在社区人群中,预测心血管事件的生物标志物并未始终为标准风险因素提供信息。许多先前研究的生物标志物的一个局限性是它们缺乏心血管特异性。
为了确定 3 种由心血管应激诱导的新型生物标志物的预后价值,我们在弗雷明汉心脏研究中的 3428 名参与者(平均年龄为 59 岁,53%为女性)中测量了可溶性 ST2、生长分化因子-15 和高敏肌钙蛋白 I。我们进行了多变量调整的比例风险模型,以评估生物标志物个体和联合预测不良结局的能力。我们还构建了一个“多标志物”评分,该评分由 3 种生物标志物(B 型利钠肽和高敏 C 反应蛋白除外)组成。在平均 11.3 年的随访期间,发生了 488 例死亡,336 例主要心血管事件,162 例心力衰竭事件和 142 例冠状动脉事件。在多变量调整模型中,除了冠状动脉事件外,这 3 种新生物标志物均与每个终点相关(P<0.001)。在最高四分位数的多标志物评分的个体中,死亡风险增加了 3 倍(调整后的危险比,3.2;95%置信区间,2.2-4.7;P<0.001),心力衰竭风险增加了 6 倍(6.2;95%置信区间,2.6-14.8;P<0.001),心血管事件风险增加了 2 倍(1.9;95%置信区间,1.3-2.7;P=0.001)。将多标志物评分添加到临床变量中会导致 c 统计量(P=0.005 或更低)和净重新分类改善(P=0.001 或更低)显著增加。
在非卧床个体中可检测到多种心血管应激的生物标志物,并且可以增加标准风险因素预测死亡、全因心血管事件和心力衰竭的预后价值。