• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊黏膜剥离术:老年人群中的安全性和有效性再评估。

Cholecystomucoclasis: revaluation of safety and validity in aged populations.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 3-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 21;12:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-113.

DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-12-113
PMID:22909056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3462142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the safety and validity of cholecystomucoclasis (CM) and compared its intraoperative characteristics with those of standard cholecystectomy (SC).

METHODS

We enrolled 174 patients who underwent cholecystectomy and retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients in the SC and CM groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences in age (71.1 vs. 61.9 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), and serum C-reactive protein levels (CRP) (18.1 vs. 4.7 mg/dL) were observed between the CM and SC groups. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in the operation time (129 vs. 108 min), amount of blood loss (147 vs. 80 mL), intraoperative complications (0% vs. 5.7%), or duration of hospital stay (13.2 vs. 8.9 days) between the 2 groups. A high conversion rate (35.3%), postoperative complications (33%), and frequent drain insertions (94%) were observed in the CM group.

CONCLUSIONS

CM is a safe and valid surgical procedure and surgeons should not hesitate to transition to CM for patients who are of advanced age, in poor general condition (high ASA classification), or have high levels of serum CRP.

摘要

背景

我们评估了胆囊黏膜剥离术(CM)的安全性和有效性,并将其与标准胆囊切除术(SC)的术中特点进行了比较。

方法

我们纳入了 174 例行胆囊切除术的患者,并回顾性评估了 SC 组和 CM 组患者的结局。

结果

CM 组和 SC 组在年龄(71.1 岁比 61.9 岁)、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)和血清 C 反应蛋白水平(CRP)(18.1 毫克/分升比 4.7 毫克/分升)方面存在显著差异。然而,两组在手术时间(129 分钟比 108 分钟)、出血量(147 毫升比 80 毫升)、术中并发症(0%比 5.7%)或住院时间(13.2 天比 8.9 天)方面无显著差异。CM 组的转换率较高(35.3%)、术后并发症较多(33%)、引流管插入频繁(94%)。

结论

CM 是一种安全有效的手术方法,对于年龄较大、一般状况较差(ASA 分类较高)或 CRP 水平较高的患者,外科医生不应犹豫而应转为 CM 治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/f139b7d301ff/1471-230X-12-113-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/b2a37a942f2e/1471-230X-12-113-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/21f8acad1039/1471-230X-12-113-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/f139b7d301ff/1471-230X-12-113-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/b2a37a942f2e/1471-230X-12-113-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/21f8acad1039/1471-230X-12-113-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114f/3462142/f139b7d301ff/1471-230X-12-113-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Cholecystomucoclasis: revaluation of safety and validity in aged populations.胆囊黏膜剥离术:老年人群中的安全性和有效性再评估。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 21;12:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-113.
2
Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.B超引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年高危急性胆囊炎的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 9;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0294-2.
3
Single-incision versus 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones: A prospective randomized study.有症状胆结石患者单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Surgery. 2017 Jul;162(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.单切口与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:前瞻性随机研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 21;19(3):394-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.394.
5
Is intraoperative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis?在腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石过程中,术中胆管造影是否必要?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2147-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2147.
6
The influence of residents in the outcome of elective laparoscopic surgery: a prospective study comparing a teaching hospital and a private community hospital in Italy.住院医师对择期腹腔镜手术结果的影响:一项比较意大利一家教学医院和一家私立社区医院的前瞻性研究。
Clin Ter. 2017 Jan-Feb;168(1):e28-e32. doi: 10.7417/CT.2017.1978.
7
Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.在单一机构进行的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/ases.12487. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
8
Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be safety performed in the elderly?腹腔镜胆囊切除术能在老年人中安全实施吗?
Ann Ital Chir. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):21-4.
9
Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beyond 72 h of symptom onset.症状出现超过72小时的急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0409-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory setting.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术在日间病房中的可行性和安全性。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019 Jun;18(3):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of the Literature on Partial Resections of the Gallbladder, 1898-2022: The Outline of the Conception of Subtotal Cholecystectomy and a Suggestion to Use the Terms 'Subtotal Open-Tract Cholecystectomy' and 'Subtotal Closed-Tract Cholecystectomy'.1898年至2022年胆囊部分切除术的文献综述:次全胆囊切除术概念概述及对使用“次全开放入路胆囊切除术”和“次全闭合入路胆囊切除术”术语的建议
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):1230. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031230.

本文引用的文献

1
Technical progress in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our initial experience.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的技术进展:我们的初步经验
Minim Invasive Surg. 2011;2011:972647. doi: 10.1155/2011/972647. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly.腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全的,但在老年人中应用不足。
Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):1014-20. doi: 10.1177/000313481107700820.
3
Outcomes of contemporary management of gangrenous and non-gangrenous acute cholecystitis.当代坏疽性和非坏疽性急性胆囊炎的治疗结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Aug;13(8):551-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00327.x. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: How I do it?单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我的手术方法
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):17-23. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72367.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一系列患者的初步评估。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1403-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0786-7. Epub 2009 Dec 25.
6
Biliary cystadenocarcinoma of the gall bladder: a case report.胆囊胆管囊腺癌:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2009 Oct 15;3:75. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-3-75.
7
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗严重胆囊炎。
Surg Today. 2009;39(10):870-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3975-4. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
8
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy as an alternative procedure designed to prevent bile duct injury: experience of a hospital in northern China.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术作为一种旨在预防胆管损伤的替代手术:中国北方一家医院的经验。
Surg Today. 2009;39(6):510-3. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3916-2. Epub 2009 May 27.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly: a retrospective study of 100 patients.老年急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:100例患者的回顾性研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):1975-80.
10
Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : scarless cholecystectomy.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:无痕胆囊切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1393-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0252-y. Epub 2009 Jan 1.