• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全的,但在老年人中应用不足。

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly.

作者信息

Tucker James J, Yanagawa Franz, Grim Rod, Bell Theodore, Ahuja Vanita

机构信息

York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):1014-20. doi: 10.1177/000313481107700820.

DOI:10.1177/000313481107700820
PMID:21944516
Abstract

Studies confirm that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficacious for elderly patients. The purposes of this study were to evaluate if LC is underused in the elderly and if it is a safe option in that group. Open cholecystectomy (OC) and LC were compared in nonelderly (40 to 64 years) and elderly (65 years or older) matched patient groups identified with gallbladder disease using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005 to 2008). Length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, and mortality were evaluated as outcomes. Using multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of OC were identified. After case-matching, each group had 11,926 patients. A χ(2) test showed that elderly (20.1 vs 15.0%, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo OC. Elderly patients had significantly higher comorbidities and were operated on as emergent case (all P < 0.05). OC had longer LOS and mortality (all P < 0.05). Among 10 other variables in logistic regression, elderly had a higher likelihood of receiving OC (OR, 1.299; P < 0 0.001). Significant disparity exists between elderly and nonelderly patients in use of LC surgery. LC has a lower complication rate than OC; however, elderly undergo LC less often. Awareness needs to be raised for offering earlier operative intervention and the superior results of LC in the elderly.

摘要

研究证实,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)对老年患者是安全有效的。本研究的目的是评估LC在老年患者中是否未得到充分应用,以及在该群体中它是否是一种安全的选择。使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库(2005年至2008年),对确诊患有胆囊疾病的非老年(40至64岁)和老年(65岁及以上)匹配患者组进行了开腹胆囊切除术(OC)和LC的比较。将住院时间(LOS)、30天并发症和死亡率作为结果进行评估。使用多因素逻辑回归分析确定OC的独立预测因素。病例匹配后,每组有11926例患者。χ²检验显示,老年患者(20.1%对15.0%,P<0.001)接受OC的可能性更高。老年患者的合并症明显更多,且多为急诊手术(所有P<0.05)。OC的住院时间更长,死亡率更高(所有P<0.05)。在逻辑回归分析的其他10个变量中,老年患者接受OC的可能性更高(OR,1.299;P<0.001)。老年患者和非老年患者在LC手术的使用上存在显著差异。LC的并发症发生率低于OC;然而,老年患者接受LC的频率较低。需要提高认识,以便为老年患者提供更早的手术干预以及LC的更好效果。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly.腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全的,但在老年人中应用不足。
Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):1014-20. doi: 10.1177/000313481107700820.
2
A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.一项基于人群的队列研究,比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;97(2):334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05466.x.
3
Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis.年龄、胆囊切除术方式和时机与老年胆囊炎患者手术和功能结局的关系。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(5):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
4
Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.退伍军人健康管理局医院中开腹胆囊切除术及转为开腹胆囊切除术的趋势、结果和预测因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.020.
5
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in diabetic patients and postoperative outcome.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术治疗糖尿病患者的效果及术后转归比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):764-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1248-y. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
6
Changing approaches to cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a 10-year retrospective study in Taiwan.改变老年患者胆囊切除术的方法:台湾的一项 10 年回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2922-31. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0781-0.
7
Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older.65岁及以上患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Jun;8(3):208-10.
8
Predicting Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术:一项单机构回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2373-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4513-1.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Pediatric Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.小儿患者腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术:倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):322-327. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0655. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Gangrenous cholecystitis: a contemporary review.坏疽性胆囊炎:当代综述
J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.058. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Chyle and Bile Leak Following Open Cholecystectomy: A Rare Complication.开腹胆囊切除术后乳糜漏和胆漏:一种罕见的并发症。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59338. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59338. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease.胆囊疾病患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开放手术效果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Avicenna J Med. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):3-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777710. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Classification and regression model to manage the hospitalization for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术住院管理的分类和回归模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41597-1.
4
Readmissions After Biliary Acute Pancreatitis: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.胆源性急性胰腺炎后的再入院情况:全国再入院数据库分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Aug;15(4):188-199. doi: 10.14740/gr1548. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis in the Elderly: A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Intra and Postoperative Complications.老年急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性:围手术期并发症危险因素的多因素分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 2;57(3):230. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030230.
6
Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4727-4740. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07805-z. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.年龄和种族差异导致接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的机制。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4032-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06695-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Randomized trial of umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients: extraction of gallbladder through subxiphoid port vs. umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.高危患者脐部切口疝的随机试验:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后经剑突下端口与脐部端口胆囊取出术对比
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Sep;13(3):342-349. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76001. Epub 2018 May 25.
9
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly: An Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Nepal.尼泊尔西部一家三级护理医院开展老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:8204578. doi: 10.1155/2017/8204578. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后手术部位感染的危险因素
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 22;4(2):ofx036. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx036. eCollection 2017 Spring.