Department of Psychiatry, Lagan Valley Hospital, Hillsborough Road, Lisburn, BT28 1JP, Northern Ireland, UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 May;35(10):845-50. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.709909. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
To compare long-term cognitive outcomes of patients treated with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling after subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH).
Retrospective matched cohort study assessed neuropsychological functioning at least 12 months after aneurysmal SAH treatment. Fourteen patients treated by endovascular coiling and nine patients treated by surgical clipping participated. After gaining written consent, a comprehensive neuropsychological battery was completed. Standardised tests were employed to assess pre-morbid and current intellectual functioning (IQ), attention, speed of information processing, memory and executive function as well as psychosocial functioning and affect.
Treatment groups were not significantly different in terms of age, pre-morbid IQ, time from injury to treatment or time since injury. A significant effect of treatment on full-scale IQ score (p = 0.025), performance IQ (p = 0.045) and verbal IQ score (p = 0.029), all favouring the coiled group was observed. A medium effect size between groups difference in immediate memory (p = 0.19, partial η(2) = 0.08) was also observed. No significant between group differences on attention, executive functioning and speed of information processing measures or mood and psychosocial functioning were noted. Both groups reported increased anxiety and memory, attention and speed of information processing deficits relative to normative data.
Study findings indicate fewer cognitive deficits following endovascular coiling. Cognitive deficits in the clipped group may be due in part to the invasive nature of neurosurgical clipping. Further prospective research with regard to long-term cognitive and emotional outcomes is warranted. IMPLICATIONS OF REHABILITATION: • Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms by either endovascualar coiling or neurosurgical clipping can result in significant long-term physical disability as well as cognitive impairment. • Observed cognitive impairment(s) tend to be less in patients following endovascular coiling. • Following ruptured aneurysm, patients with cognitive impairment report reduced health related quality of life and increased anxiety. • Those with identified cognitive impairment(s) may benefit from cognitive remediation.
比较蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者接受手术夹闭或血管内介入治疗后的长期认知结局。
回顾性匹配队列研究评估了动脉瘤性 SAH 治疗后至少 12 个月的神经心理学功能。共有 14 例接受血管内介入治疗的患者和 9 例接受手术夹闭的患者参与了研究。在获得书面同意后,完成了全面的神经心理学测试。采用标准化测试评估了发病前和当前的智力(智商)、注意力、信息处理速度、记忆和执行功能以及社会心理功能和情绪。
治疗组在年龄、发病前智商、从损伤到治疗的时间或从损伤到随访的时间方面无显著差异。治疗对全量表智商得分(p = 0.025)、操作智商(p = 0.045)和言语智商得分(p = 0.029)均有显著影响,所有这些都有利于血管内介入治疗组。组间即时记忆差异具有中等效应量(p = 0.19,部分 η² = 0.08)。两组间在注意力、执行功能和信息处理速度测量或情绪和社会心理功能方面无显著差异。两组均报告焦虑和记忆、注意力和信息处理速度的缺陷增加,与正常数据相比。
研究结果表明,血管内介入治疗后认知缺陷较少。夹闭组的认知缺陷部分可能是由于神经外科夹闭的侵袭性。需要进一步进行前瞻性研究,以了解长期认知和情绪结局。
• 破裂颅内动脉瘤的治疗,无论是血管内介入治疗还是神经外科夹闭,都会导致长期的身体残疾和认知障碍。
• 血管内介入治疗后,患者的认知障碍程度较低。
• 破裂性动脉瘤患者报告认知障碍会导致健康相关生活质量下降和焦虑增加。
• 有明确认知障碍的患者可能受益于认知矫正。