Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Gastric Cancer. 2013 Jul;16(3):324-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0187-9. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was revised in 2009, based on a large dataset of 6512 patients from 16 trials. However, no gastric cancer patients were included in those data. The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference between RECIST version 1.0 and version 1.1 in advanced gastric cancer.
From 2004 to 2009, 129 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer received S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line treatment at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Ninety-seven of these patients who had had baseline and post-treatment computed tomography scans performed were included in this study. Measurements of tumors were conducted retrospectively.
At the baseline of first-line chemotherapy, 172 lymph nodes in 54 patients were considered to be candidate target lesions by RECIST version 1.0. However, only 38% of the lymph nodes were classified as target lesions by RECIST version 1.1, with 47% classified as non-target lesions and 15% classified as non-pathological. By RECIST version 1.0, the proportion of patients with target lesions at the baseline of first-line chemotherapy was 67% (65/97), and this percentage was significantly reduced according to RECIST version 1.1 (53%; 51/97) (McNemar's exact test, P < 0.001). The findings at the baseline of second-line chemotherapy were similar (reduced from 62 to 49%; McNemar's exact test, P = 0.002). Overall response rates of first-line chemotherapy were 52% (34/65) according to RECIST version 1.0 and 55% (28/51) according to version 1.1.
The revision of RECIST significantly reduced the proportion of patients classified with target lesions at the baselines of first-line and second-line chemotherapies. No obvious difference in overall response rates was observed.
2009 年,基于来自 16 项试验的 6512 例患者的大型数据集,对实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)进行了修订。然而,这些数据中均未包含胃癌患者。本研究旨在明确 RECIST 版本 1.0 和 1.1 在晚期胃癌中的差异。
2004 年至 2009 年,国立癌症中心医院东分院收治了 129 例接受 S-1 联合顺铂作为一线治疗的晚期胃癌患者。本研究纳入了这 129 例患者中的 97 例基线和治疗后均进行了 CT 扫描的患者。肿瘤的测量是回顾性进行的。
在一线化疗的基线时,RECIST 版本 1.0 认为 54 例患者的 172 个淋巴结为候选靶病灶。然而,只有 38%的淋巴结被 RECIST 版本 1.1 归类为靶病灶,47%归类为非靶病灶,15%归类为非病理性。根据 RECIST 版本 1.0,一线化疗基线时具有靶病灶的患者比例为 67%(65/97),而根据 RECIST 版本 1.1 这一比例显著降低(53%;51/97)(McNemar 确切检验,P<0.001)。二线化疗基线时的结果类似(从 62%降至 49%;McNemar 确切检验,P=0.002)。根据 RECIST 版本 1.0,一线化疗的总缓解率为 52%(34/65),而根据版本 1.1 为 55%(28/51)。
RECIST 的修订显著降低了一线和二线化疗基线时被归类为靶病灶的患者比例。但总缓解率未见明显差异。