• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期胃癌患者的早期肿瘤退缩和深度缓解:一线 S-1 加奥沙利铂与 S-1 加顺铂的随机 III 期研究的回顾性分析。

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minamiumemotomachi, Matsuyama, 791-0280, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, 2-1-1 Asamizodai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0380, Japan.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):138-146. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0845-7. Epub 2018 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-018-0845-7
PMID:29948386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

ETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal).

RESULTS

Among 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506-0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492-0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

摘要

背景

我们利用 G-SOX 研究的数据,调查了早期肿瘤退缩(ETS)和深度应答(DpR),该研究比较了 S-1 加奥沙利铂与 S-1 加顺铂作为晚期胃癌(AGC)一线治疗。

方法

ETS 是指与基线相比,第 6 周首次评估时目标病变最长直径总和的%下降。DpR 是研究治疗期间的最大收缩%。通过对数秩检验和包括 G-SOX 研究中获得的预后因素的 Cox 回归分析评估 ETS(截断值 20%)和 DpR(连续值)对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响;ECOG 表现状态、基线肿瘤直径总和、疾病状态(复发/不可切除)和组织学(弥漫/肠型)。

结果

在 G-SOX 研究中纳入的 685 名患者中,对 632 名进行了首次肿瘤评估的患者进行了分析。ETS≥20%的患者具有更长的 PFS(中位 4.5 个月 vs. 2.8 个月,p<0.0001)和 OS(中位 14.8 个月 vs. 10.5 个月,p<0.0001)比 ETS<20%的患者。ETS<20%与 ETS≥20%的调整风险比为 0.606(95%置信区间 0.506-0.725),PFS 和 0.589(95%置信区间 0.492-0.704)OS。DpR 也与 PFS 和 OS 显著相关(均 p<0.0001)。这些结果在 SOX 和 CS 组之间相似。

结论

在接受一线治疗的 AGC 患者中,ETS 和 DpR 可能是 PFS 和 OS 的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin.晚期胃癌患者的早期肿瘤退缩和深度缓解:一线 S-1 加奥沙利铂与 S-1 加顺铂的随机 III 期研究的回顾性分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):138-146. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0845-7. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
2
Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer.III 期研究比较奥沙利铂加 S-1 与顺铂加 S-1 治疗初治晚期胃癌患者的疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):141-148. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu472. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
3
Impact of progression type on overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer based on randomized phase III study of S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin.基于S-1联合奥沙利铂与S-1联合顺铂的随机III期研究,进展类型对晚期胃癌患者总生存期的影响
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jul;20(4):640-645. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0666-5. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
Meta-analysis supporting noninferiority of oxaliplatin plus S-1 to cisplatin plus S-1 in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (G-SOX study): indirect comparison with S-1 alone.支持奥沙利铂联合S-1与顺铂联合S-1用于晚期胃癌一线治疗非劣效性的Meta分析(G-SOX研究):与单独使用S-1的间接比较
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):668-675. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0938-9. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
5
Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial).多中心 III 期临床试验:替吉奥(S-1)联合顺铂与 S-1 联合奥沙利铂方案一线治疗晚期胃癌(SOPP 试验)
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-167. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01101-4. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (SOLAR): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.S-1 联合亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂对比 S-1 联合顺铂一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效(SOLAR):一项随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1045-1056. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30315-6. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Depth of response is a significant predictor for long-term outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.反应深度是接受曲妥珠单抗治疗的晚期胃癌患者长期预后的重要预测指标。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):31169-31179. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16099.
8
A randomised phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: Capecitabine plus cisplatin ascertainment versus S-1 plus cisplatin randomised PII trial (XParTS II).卡培他滨加顺铂对比 S-1 加顺铂作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的随机 II 期试验:卡培他滨加顺铂确证对比 S-1 加顺铂随机 II 期试验(XParTS II)。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
[Safety and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and S-1 for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 lymph nodes dissection].奥沙利铂联合S-1辅助化疗用于D2淋巴结清扫术后局部进展期胃癌患者的安全性和疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):145-152. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201016-00561.
10
Associations between early tumor shrinkage and depth of response and clinical outcomes in patients treated with 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.一线化疗治疗晚期胃癌患者的早期肿瘤退缩与深度缓解和临床结局的相关性。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar;21(2):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0729-2. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A phase 2 study of tislelizumab combined with bevacizumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.一项评估替雷利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗及化疗作为持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌一线治疗的2期研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 24;85:103308. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103308. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Impact of early tumor shrinkage on survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan in third- or later-line settings.曲妥珠单抗德鲁昔单抗用于三线及以上治疗HER2阳性晚期胃癌患者时早期肿瘤缩小对生存结局的影响。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 24;18:17562848251333538. doi: 10.1177/17562848251333538. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Depth of response predicts the clinical outcome of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer to trastuzumab-based first-line chemotherapy.反应深度可预测晚期HER2阳性胃癌接受曲妥珠单抗一线化疗的临床结局。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;80(4):807-813. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3422-6. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Associations between early tumor shrinkage and depth of response and clinical outcomes in patients treated with 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.一线化疗治疗晚期胃癌患者的早期肿瘤退缩与深度缓解和临床结局的相关性。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar;21(2):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0729-2. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Survival for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of JCOG1113.
早期肿瘤退缩和反应深度作为晚期胆道癌生存的预测因素:JCOG1113 的探索性分析。
Oncologist. 2024 Jan 5;29(1):e97-e107. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad220.
4
Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil: an exploratory analysis of the JCOG0807.每两周一次多西他赛联合顺铂及氟尿嘧啶治疗转移性食管癌患者的早期肿瘤缩小及缓解深度:JCOG0807探索性分析
Esophagus. 2023 Apr;20(2):272-280. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00968-9. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
A narrative review: depth of response as a predictor of the long-term outcomes for solid tumors.一篇叙述性综述:反应深度作为实体瘤长期预后的预测指标
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1119-1130. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2547.
6
Effect of early tumor response on the health-related quality of life among patients on second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the ABSOLUTE trial.ABSOLUTE 试验中二线化疗晚期胃癌患者早期肿瘤应答对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;24(2):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01131-y. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Multiple liver metastases with synchronous gastric and transverse colon cancer diagnosed by gastric perforation successfully treated by SOX plus bevacizumab and completely resected by surgery: a case report.通过胃穿孔诊断出的同步性胃癌和横结肠癌伴多发肝转移,经SOX联合贝伐单抗成功治疗并通过手术完全切除:一例病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2020 Mar 16;6(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40792-020-00808-x.
8
Comparison of efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.S-1与卡培他滨治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16667. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016667.
9
Efficacy and safety assessment of S-1-based regimens comparing to intravenous fluorouracil-based ones in Asian patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A system review and meta-analysis.在亚洲转移性结直肠癌患者中,基于S-1的治疗方案与基于静脉氟尿嘧啶的治疗方案的疗效和安全性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15999. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015999.
Depth of response is a significant predictor for long-term outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.
反应深度是接受曲妥珠单抗治疗的晚期胃癌患者长期预后的重要预测指标。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):31169-31179. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16099.
4
Relation of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) observed in first-line treatment to efficacy parameters of subsequent treatment in FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306).FIRE-3(AIOKRK0306)中一线治疗中早期肿瘤退缩(ETS)与后续治疗疗效参数的关系。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;140(8):1918-1925. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30592. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
5
Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Favorable Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with FOLFOX Plus Cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05).在转移性结直肠癌患者中,FOLFOX 联合西妥昔单抗治疗的有利治疗结局预测因素:早期肿瘤退缩和反应深度(JACCRO CC-05)。
Target Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(6):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s11523-016-0445-6.
6
Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者治疗中的早期肿瘤缩小(ETS)和缓解深度(DpR)
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1927-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.116. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest.早期肿瘤退缩和深度缓解反应可预测一线化疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的长期结局:来自西北肿瘤协作组 TRIBE 三期试验的结果。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv112. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer.III 期研究比较奥沙利铂加 S-1 与顺铂加 S-1 治疗初治晚期胃癌患者的疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):141-148. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu472. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.采用西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌时,早期肿瘤退缩可预测长期疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3764-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8532. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
10
Challenges of guarantee-time bias.保证时间偏倚的挑战。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2963-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5283. Epub 2013 Jul 8.