Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):225-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00002.
Studies have identified characteristics of adenomas detected on colonoscopy to be predictive of adenoma recurrence.
To assess the role of both colonoscopy-related factors and polyp characteristics on the risk for colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection.
Population-based case-control study (3148 case participants and 3274 control participants).
Rhine-Neckar region of Germany.
Case and control participants with physician-validated detection of polyps (other than hyperplastic polyps) at a previous colonoscopy in the past 10 years.
Detailed history and results of previous colonoscopies were obtained through interviews and medical records. Case and control participants were compared according to colonoscopy-related factors (incompleteness, poor bowel preparation, incomplete removal of all polyps, and no surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years) and polyp characteristics (≥ 1 cm, villous components or high-grade dysplasia, ≥ 3 polyps, and ≥ 1 proximal polyp). Odds ratios (ORs) and attributable fractions were derived by using multiple logistic regression and the Levin formula.
155 case participants and 260 control participants with physician-validated polyp detection in the past 10 years were identified. The following characteristics were significantly more common among case participants than among control participants: not all polyps completely removed (29.0% vs. 9.6%; OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.11 to 6.60]), no surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years (26.5% vs. 11.5%; OR, 2.96 [CI, 1.70 to 5.16]), and detection of 3 or more polyps (14.2% vs. 7.3%; OR, 2.21 [CI, 1.07 to 4.54]). Odds ratios ranged from 1.12 to 1.42 and CIs included 1.00 for all other variables. Overall, 41.1% and 21.7% of cancer cases were statistically attributable to colonoscopy-related factors and polyp characteristics, respectively.
This was an observational study with potential for residual confounding and selection bias.
Colonoscopy-related factors are more important than polyp characteristics for stratification of colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polyp detection in the community setting.
研究已经确定了结肠镜检查中发现的腺瘤的特征,这些特征可以预测腺瘤的复发。
评估结肠镜检查相关因素和息肉特征对结肠镜检查发现息肉后结直肠癌风险的影响。
基于人群的病例对照研究(3148 例病例参与者和 3274 例对照参与者)。
德国莱茵-内卡地区。
在过去 10 年内,经医生验证在结肠镜检查中发现息肉(非增生性息肉)的病例和对照参与者。
通过访谈和病历获得详细的病史和以往结肠镜检查结果。根据结肠镜检查相关因素(不完整、肠道准备不佳、未能完全切除所有息肉、5 年内未进行监测结肠镜检查)和息肉特征(≥1cm、绒毛成分或高级别异型增生、≥3 个息肉、≥1 个近端息肉)比较病例和对照参与者。使用多变量逻辑回归和莱文公式得出比值比(ORs)和归因分数。
在过去 10 年内,有 155 例病例参与者和 260 例对照参与者经医生验证发现息肉。以下特征在病例参与者中比在对照参与者中更为常见:未能完全切除所有息肉(29.0%比 9.6%;OR,3.73[95%CI,2.11 至 6.60])、5 年内未进行监测结肠镜检查(26.5%比 11.5%;OR,2.96[CI,1.70 至 5.16])和发现 3 个或更多息肉(14.2%比 7.3%;OR,2.21[CI,1.07 至 4.54])。OR 值范围为 1.12 至 1.42,所有其他变量的 CI 均包含 1.00。总的来说,41.1%和 21.7%的癌症病例归因于结肠镜检查相关因素和息肉特征,分别。
这是一项观察性研究,存在残余混杂和选择偏倚的可能性。
在社区环境中,结肠镜检查相关因素比息肉特征更能分层结直肠癌风险。